To assist you in compiling the information necessary to prepare your 2024 individual income tax return, we are providing the following list and request you provide information to the best of your ability. In connection with all items of income, if married, please indicate whether the income is the taxpayer, spouse or joint (TSJ). When submitting materials, please include original and/or corrected source documents to ensure we have all copies or at a minimum the most current version (please note the date of changes on the tax documents).

The following is a discussion of the rules applicable to the filing of 2024 individual income taxes and 2025 at this time.

OTHER FEDERAL NEWS -

OTHER FEDERAL NEWS -

The Internal Revenue Service issued IR-2024-85 in November 2024 providing transition relief for third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs – payment apps and online marketplaces) regarding transactions during calendar years 2024 and 2025.  As a result, TPSOs will be required to report transactions when the amount of total payments for those transactions is more than $5,000 in 2024, more than $2,500 in 2025 and more than $600 in calendar year 2026 and after.  Reporting will be done via Form 1099-K.

Beginning January 1, 2024 the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) required certain “reporting companies” to file a report of “beneficial owners” with FinCEN.  A reporting company is either a 1) domestic reporting company – corporation, limited liability company, limited partnership, or similar entity created by the filing of a document with any state, territory or Indian tribe, or 2) a foreign reporting company – a non-US entity that registers to do business with a US state, territory or Indian tribe.  23 listed exemptions exist for CTA reporting requirements and various reporting dates based on existence of the reporting company.  This is NOT a tax reporting requirement but a reporting requirement.  The rule has been in legal limbo since the onset.  On January 23, 2025 the Supreme Court lifted an injunction related to a case over the act.  However, the FinCEN agency clarified on January 24, 2025 that due to a separate court case with another injunction, reporting remains voluntary at this time.  Obligations to file beneficial ownership information under the Reporting Rule remains suspended at this current date.

CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NEWS –

Reduction in Certain Income Tax Rates:  For tax years beginning January 1, 2024, the 3% rate on the first $10,000 earned by unmarried filers and the first $20,000 by couples will decrease to 2%.  The 5% rate on the next $40,000 earned by unmarried filers and the next $80,000 by couples will decrease to 4.5%.  The benefit will be capped at unmarried filers who earn $150,000 and couples who earn $300,000.

Pass-Through Entity Tax:  Starting with tax years on or after January 1,2024, an entity that elects to pay such tax must give the Commissioner of Revenue Services written notice for each tax year it makes the election and must do so no later than the due date (or extended due date) for filing the return.  For 2024, the entity may elect to file Form CT-PET, Connecticut Pass-Through Entity Tax return, in addition to Form CT-1065/CT-1120SI, Connecticut Composite Income Tax Return, by checking the box at the bottom of the first page of Form CT-1065/CT-1120SI and filing Form CT-PET.  The election is irrevocable and cannot be amended for the year.

Subtraction Modification for Payments Received from the Fallen Officer Fund:  Applicable for tax years beginning January 1, 2024, payments from the Fallen Officer Fund are subtracted from Connecticut adjusted gross income.

Subtraction Modification for Contributions made by taxpayers to ABLE accounts:  For tax years beginning January 1, 2024, the subtraction modification shall not exceed $5,000 per taxable year for single filers and not more than $10,000 per taxable year for joint filers. 

Connecticut Income Tax Subtraction for Pensions and Annuity Income: Beginning with the 2022 tax year, taxpayers with federal AGIs below specified thresholds were allowed to deduct 100% of their qualifying pension and annuity income when calculating their CT AGI.  This modification applies to the extent such income is properly included in the taxpayer’s federal AGI for the taxable year.  For 2024, the deduction applies to taxpayers with federal AGIs below 1) $100,000 for single filers, married filing separately and heads of households and 2) $150,000 for married people filing jointly. 

Certain IRA Distributions: Beginning with the 2023 tax year, taxpayers may deduct a portion of their distributions from individual retirement accounts (IRAs), other than Roth IRAs.  The deduction is 50% for 2024, 75% for 2025 and 100% beginning in 2026.  The qualifying income thresholds for this exemption are the same as those for the pension and annuity exemption described above.

Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) Income: Taxpayers may deduct 50% of their TRS income.  Those who qualify for the general pension and annuity exemption described above may take either exemption.

Military Retirement Pay: Military retirement pay, is exempt from Connecticut income tax to the extent it is included in federal adjusted gross income, if you are a retired member of the armed forces of the United States or the National Guard (retired military member) or if you are the beneficiary receiving survivor benefits under an option or election made by a deceased retired military member.  Payments received by a former spouse of a retired military member under a final decree of divorce/separation do not qualify for the military retirement pay exclusion.

Limitation of Property Tax Credit: Residents may qualify for a credit up to $300 for property taxes paid on a primary residence or automobile in Connecticut subject to Connecticut adjusted gross income limits and age (65 and over).

Amendment to Withholding Provisions Relative to Pension & Annuity Distributions:  New legislation modified the withholding requirements in connection with distributions of certain payments.  Under the new law, mandatory withholding is no longer required, except in limited circumstances.  A recipient may still request that Connecticut income tax be withheld from such distributions.  With regard to lump sum distributions of certain payments, payers remain obligated to withhold from qualified distributions if the distribution is in excess of $5,000 or is more than 50% of the balance of the account from which such distribution is being made from.  This legislation is effective January 1, 2025 to tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2025.

NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION NEWS – 

On December 28, 2018 New York State Department of Taxation issued a Technical Memorandum stating that they decoupled from certain personal income tax IRS changes implemented by TCJA for tax years 2018 and thereafter.  These items include certain itemized deductions, alimony or separate maintenance payments, qualified moving expenses reimbursement and moving expenses, Empire State child tax credit and New York 529 college savings account withdrawals.

New York State’s current maximum tax rate for individuals increased from 8.82% to 9.65% for 2021 – 2027 calendar years.   Two new upper limit tax bracket rates were also created regardless of filing status at 10.3% ($5 million - $25 million) and 10.9% ($25 million and above).  These increases leave New York State with one of the highest marginal state tax rates in the country.

New York itemized deduction limitation for taxpayers whose New York adjusted gross income is over $10 million has been extended through tax year 2029.

New York tax authorities continue to focus on auditing income tax returns filed by non-residents who work for New York employers, and are issuing desk audit notices in an effort to claw back missed tax revenue. 

NEXUS

As many states continue to face substantial budgetary restraints for 2025 and beyond, they are aggressively pursuing revenue collections from residents and nonresidents.  States have continued to expand the definition of nexus – creating activity leading to many taxpayers being required to file state taxes in more states.  With telecommuting and hybrid work situations becoming the norm as a result of the pandemic, many individuals find themselves working in states other than their primary office locations.  Taxpayers need to consider whether their income will be taxed in the state in which they are working as well as the state in which their primary office is located.  Certain states impose a “convenience” rule that sources income to the employer’s office location if an employee is working remotely out of convenience and not out of necessity for the employer.  With telecommuting comes the flexibility to work from any location, not just the state where the individual resides potentially creating a change of residence on a domicile and/or statutory basis. 

Remote work is likely here to stay for the foreseeable future.  As a “hot topic”, it is expected that regulations and guidance will continue to develop and change as both taxpayers and preparers will be looking for additional guidance as released.  The tax impact of remote work and the potential for increased scrutiny and auditing exists.  Analyzing all facts and maintaining detailed records and documentation is critical.  It is recommended that you retain pay stubs as some states do not make allocations on your W2 and this documentation is critical.  If you have an employment change, payroll provider and/or benefit provider change, make sure to access all records before they are no longer available to you.  As of the release of this letter, here are some notable announcements from Connecticut and New York:

Connecticut:

On March 4, 2021, Governor Lamont signed H.B. No.6516, which provided that any Connecticut resident who paid tax to a state that uses a convenience of the employer rule will be allowed a credit against their Connecticut income tax for the paid to the other state on income earned while working remotely from Connecticut. Connecticut explained that these credits only apply to the 2020 tax.  For tax years 2021 - 2023, Connecticut did not issue a change in position on this matter.  Continued guidance is expected on this subject so it is unclear if there might possibly be double taxation of state taxes in the future.  Like New York, Connecticut has been sending out notices challenging credits for taxes paid to other states as well as modifications.

Absence further legislation subsequent to tax year 2021 and as of this date, it appears Connecticut will adhere to the convenience rule for tax year 2024. Residents that work remotely from home for their employer in New York will continue to pay tax to New York on their wages and qualify for the credit for taxes paid to another state on their Connecticut tax return.  Tax experts continue to think it will take several smaller states to form a coalition and take on New York in the courts as they refuse to come to the table for discussions. 

New York:

New York has remained in defense of its “convenience of the employer rule” during the pandemic and beyond.  The rule implies an employee whose primary work location is in New York is subject to New York taxes unless a bona fide office has been established in the employee’s remote location (specific requirements for this as specified by New York have to be fulfilled to qualify).  New York continues to send out notices and audits tax returns of nonresident filers that show a substantial change of income source to New York; we expect that this behavior will continue.  New York has also increased audit focus on resident taxpayers who are taking credit for taxes paid to other states.

For 2024, New York continues to take the same stance outlined in the previous paragraph.  Time will tell if other states will be able to take on New York in court and turn things around.

One year ago, the nation braced for a potential recession marked by elevated inflation, rising interest rates and labor shortages.  Economic uncertainty carried through 2024 with decreasing fears of a major recession due to positive economic indicators; however, the effects of inflation have established a new baseline for pricing.  All of these factors were on minds of taxpayers during the presidential election.  President Trump has made the economy and tax relief key priorities of his agenda.  Key tax-savings provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Act (TCJA) are slated to expire at the end of calendar year 2025 barring additional legislation – trillions of dollars are at stake across many of these provisions.  Of particular importance is the unprecedented opportunity to reduce gift, estate and generation-skipping transfer tax exposure in future years by making gifts that use the increased lifetime exemption levels in case they sunset on December 31, 2025 absent legislation. 

The challenge facing policymakers in 2025 is a daunting one and the massive price tag associated with extending 2017’s tax cuts could force Congress to seek new tax increases to offset these costs.  As a result, 2025 appears on track to become a year of potential volatility in tax planning.  While changes in tax laws are often drafted to take effect at a future date, there is always a possibility of changes that could become effective immediately upon enactment (or retroactive to the beginning of the year or date of introduction).  It is recommended that attention should be given to legislative changes, as well as political, economic and other factors as they develop and might affect tax policy.  Traditional tax planning, such as accelerating income into years with lower tax rates or deferring deductions into years with higher tax rates, are normally common approaches and should continue to be carefully reviewed and analyzed. 

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you.   We wish you and your families good health and best wishes for the New Year!

When you make retail purchases of goods or services in your resident state, you usually pay sales tax to the seller if the sale of such goods or services is subject to sales tax according to the law of your resident state.  The seller in turn remits the sales tax collected to the state taxing authority.  In general, when these same types of goods or services are purchased outside of your resident state, they are subject to "use tax" when the goods are brought into your resident state.

When you make retail purchases of goods or services in your resident state, you usually pay sales tax to the seller if the sale of such goods or services is subject to sales tax according to the law of your resident state.  The seller in turn remits the sales tax collected to the state taxing authority.  In general, when these same types of goods or services are purchased outside of your resident state, they are subject to "use tax" when the goods are brought into your resident state.

Today, with the increase in catalog and online shopping, many taxpayers are buying items out of state, as well as goods that are being imported, that would be subject to tax if they were purchased in their resident state.  The state tax authorities, especially Connecticut and New York, are actively pursuing the collection of this use tax in order to meet budgetary constraints.  In fact, the states, along with the Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Customs, have signed information sharing agreements to help each other collect all outstanding tax money.  Working together, the authorities have many resources available to gather their information.

Keep in mind that the taxing authorities are specifically targeting the purchase of items such as automobiles (and parts), appliances, furniture, jewelry, cameras, computers, electronics, cigarettes and other tobacco products, alcohol, boats, art and antiques.  However, they are also seeking out those taxpayers who are steady catalog and online shoppers not paying sales tax. 

The individual use tax is declared and paid when you file your resident state individual income tax return. 

If all the goods purchased and brought into Connecticut at one time total $25 or less, you do not have to pay Connecticut use tax.  The $25 exemption does not apply to goods shipped or mailed to you.  Connecticut requires that taxpayers separately list any individual item with a purchase price of $300 or more.  When listing this information, you must provide the date of purchase, a description of goods or service, the retailer or service provider and the purchase price.  Items with an individual purchase price under $300 do not have to be listed separately; instead, the total combined purchases must be given to calculate the use tax due. 

The general Connecticut sales and use tax rate for 2024 was 6.35%; however, there are categories with different tax rates from the general rates.  There are too many categories to list for the purposes of this letter; however, there are a few that need to be highlighted.  Specifically, a use tax rate of 7.75% applies to the following: the sale of most motor vehicles exceeding $50,000, the sale of each piece of jewelry exceeding $5,000, the sale of each piece of clothing or pair of footwear exceeding $1,000 and a handbag, luggage, umbrella, wallet or watch exceeding $1,000.

New York provides two options for calculating the use tax due on purchases of less than $1,000 (excluding shipping and handling) each that are not related to a business, rental real estate or royalty activities - the exact calculation method or the sales and use tax chart.  For the exact calculation method, the taxpayer must provide the purchase price, purchase date and jurisdiction of purchase.  The sales and use tax chart is a simple, time-saving method whereby the taxpayer pays use tax based on their federal adjusted gross income according to the chart established by the state.  The exact calculation method must be used on each purchase of $1,000 or more.  For individual items subject to use tax greater than $25,000, the following information must be provided: date item was purchased, description of item purchased, seller’s name and address, delivery address/address of use and purchase price.

Failure to pay use tax may result in the imposition of penalties and interest.  The states are requiring taxpayers to declare an obligation for use tax on their individual income tax returns.  Zero is a valid declaration if you do not have a liability.  If you do not make an entry on the individual use tax line of your resident tax return, you are considered to not have filed a use tax return.

Therefore, when providing your information for payment of use tax, please be sure to specify the following complete information:

1) Details of purchase information as specified by the state thresholds for reporting individual purchases.

2)  Details of purchase information as specified by the special categories in Connecticut.

If you have any questions regarding sales and use tax, please give us a call.  Information is also published on each state's website regarding this subject.

Internal Revenue Service regulations along with the tax authorities of Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts mandate that tax preparers electronically file individual, fiduciary and business income tax returns.  We believe that trends will continue with authorities requiring taxpayers and businesses to electronically file of more information including routine filings, responses, tax returns and tax payments.  Therefore, all 2024 income tax returns filed federally and in the States of Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts are required to be filed using the Federal & State Electronic Filing Program (E-File).  The firm will voluntarily file individual returns electronically in the States of California and New Jersey.  We also reserve the right to electronically file in additional states as deemed appropriate and will encourage this method of filing. 

Internal Revenue Service regulations along with the tax authorities of Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts mandate that tax preparers electronically file individual, fiduciary and business income tax returns.  We believe that trends will continue with authorities requiring taxpayers and businesses to electronically file of more information including routine filings, responses, tax returns and tax payments.  Therefore, all 2024 income tax returns filed federally and in the States of Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts are required to be filed using the Federal & State Electronic Filing Program (E-File).  The firm will voluntarily file individual returns electronically in the States of California and New Jersey.  We also reserve the right to electronically file in additional states as deemed appropriate and will encourage this method of filing. 

Our firm has informed you of the regulations and mandates for electronic filing.  However, the decision as to whether your income tax returns will be electronically filed or not rests with you, the taxpayer.  If you choose not to file electronically, we will inform you of the necessary procedures that need to be followed for “opting out.”

 Electronic filing offers the following benefits:

i. Allows the Revenue Departments to process returns quickly and accurately, saving tax dollars.

ii. Taxpayers who have a return with a balance due can file their return early and choose to make payment anytime on or before April 15, 2025.

iii. Taxpayers who file returns with refunds receive those refunds faster especially if the refund is directly deposited into their bank account. 

iv. Electronically filed returns receive an acknowledgment of receipt from the Internal Revenue Service and the applicable State Tax Authority and are verified to be mathematically correct, eliminating data entry errors and lost or misplaced mail.

If we did not prepare your returns for 2023, we will need copies of your driver’s licenses and social security cards or passports for you and your family members. 

How does this affect the process of preparing your 2024 income tax returns?

The actual preparation process of your return does not change.  However, the administration, review process and completion of the returns will be affected.  The following is an overview of how the electronic filing process will work.

1) Taxpayers should forward complete information for the preparation of their 2024 income tax returns including all supporting documentation.  Regulations for electronic filing require that our firm maintain copies of the social security cards and driver's licenses for yourself, your spouse and all dependents claimed on the 2024 tax return.  NOTE:  If you provided this information to us last year regarding the preparation of your 2023 tax return, you do not have to provide it again.  However, the driver’s license and passports on file must be current.  Please call our office to verify your information on file if you have any questions.

2) Electronic filing provides various methods for payment and receipt of your refunds.  Payments can be made by 1) paper check, 2) credit card (a convenience fee will be charged by the processing company used by tax authorities) and 3) direct debit out of a designated account.  Refunds can be issued by 1) paper check, 2) application of all or a portion to the 2025 tax year and 3) direct deposit into designated account(s) – see NOTE below.  Returns filed electronically can be filed early but payment not made until a later date designated by you whether payment is by check, credit card or direct debit until April 15, 2025.  After that date, payment is due with filing.  When submitting the information to prepare your tax return, please indicate to us how you would like to handle payments and/or refunds and return it with the information to prepare your tax return.  If you desire to use direct deposit or direct debit, please enclose a voided check so we have complete account information and the financial institution routing transit number.  It is the taxpayer’s responsibility to provide proper banking information and to verify that the payments have been withdrawn from the designated account.  Please allow enough time when scheduling payments to be made directly from accounts.  If problems with payment by direct debit are encountered, taxpayers need to have enough time available for a paper check to be submitted on a time. 

NOTE:  Generally, if you do not elect direct deposit, the State of Connecticut will issue refunds by paper check; however, they are encouraging direct deposit.  Direct deposit will NOT be available for first time Connecticut filers.  IRS and the State of New York are offering the option for receipt of refunds by direct deposit or paper check.    

WARNING: It is suggested that refunds on joint tax returns should only be directly deposited into joint bank accounts.  The federal banking regulations, as applied by each bank, may not accept a joint refund into an individual account; our firm has no knowledge of how your bank will handle this matter.  Also, be aware that refunds will be retained, not issued or decreased for any of the following: 1) delinquent federal taxes, 2) delinquent state taxes, 3) delinquent student loans, 4) delinquent spousal and/or child support, 5) delinquent state unemployment compensation debts and 6) debts owed to other state and/or federal agencies.

3) Once your return has been prepared, our firm will forward a "Review Copy" to you.  This review copy can be sent electronically using access through a portal system for your protection or by hard copy (either mail or you can pick it up at our office).  Please let us know the delivery method for the "Review Copy" on the bottom of the enclosed engagement letter which should be submitted with your tax information.

4) If you review the return and are in agreement with the return as prepared, the taxpayer(s) will need to sign Form 8879, IRS e-file Signature Authorization, Form TR-579-IT New York State e-file Signature Authorization, Form FTB 8879 California e-file Signature Authorization, Form M-8453, Massachusetts e-file Signature Authorization, as applicable, and any additional efile form(s) as necessary and included in your "Review Copy" package.  Connecticut and New Jersey accept the federal signature on Form 8879.  Tax returns cannot be filed electronically until our firm is in receipt of the signature authorization forms signed by the taxpayer(s).  We can accept the signed forms electronically. 

5) If you review the return and are NOT in agreement with the return as prepared, please call our office to discuss the questions/issues.  If necessary, a new "Review Copy" and signature authorization forms will be prepared.  Please remember that the only way electronically filed tax returns can be changed is by amending the returns.  Therefore, it is imperative that you are in complete agreement with the returns before returning the signature authorization forms to us. 

6) Once we receive your completed signature authorization forms (EFile Forms), our firm will electronically submit your Federal, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and/or California income tax returns.  Income tax returns for all other states will be filed on paper at this time unless we deem it appropriate to electronically file in the other state(s).  Once we receive acknowledgement that your electronically filed returns have been accepted by the taxing authorities, we will forward a complete package to you which will include the following documents: 1) your original information if it has not already been returned with your review copy, 2) 2024 payment vouchers to taxing authorities, if necessary, 3) 2024 income tax returns for other states to be filed by paper, if necessary, 4) 2025 estimated tax payments, if necessary, 5) a copy of the 2024 individual return electronic transmission history and acceptance notification, and 6) a final signed copy of your electronically filed 2024 Federal and state income tax returns, if requested.  Please include on the bottom of the enclosed engagement letter how you would like to receive this complete package. Any payments for taxes due to tax authorities should be filed using certified mail, return receipt requested.

Some extensions for filing 2024 tax returns must be filed electronically as paper is no longer an acceptable filing method.  Therefore, taxpayers must allow enough time for completing this process.  Please contact our office by Friday, March 21, 2025 if you will need to file extensions for the 2024 tax year.

We ask for your continued cooperation in implementing income tax return preparation and filing requirements.  If you have any questions, please give us a call.

The U.S. Tax Court lacks jurisdiction over a taxpayer’s appeal of a levy in a collection due process hearing when the IRS abandoned its levy because it applied the taxpayer’s later year overpayments to her earlier tax liability, eliminating the underpayment on which the levy was based. The 8-1 ruling by the Court resolves a split between the Third Circuit and the Fourth and D.C. Circuit.

The U.S. Tax Court lacks jurisdiction over a taxpayer’s appeal of a levy in a collection due process hearing when the IRS abandoned its levy because it applied the taxpayer’s later year overpayments to her earlier tax liability, eliminating the underpayment on which the levy was based. The 8-1 ruling by the Court resolves a split between the Third Circuit and the Fourth and D.C. Circuit.

The IRS determined that taxpayer had a tax liability for 2010 and began a levy procedure. The taxpayer appealed the levy in a collection due process hearing, and then appealed that adverse result in the Tax Court. The taxpayer asserted that she did not have an underpayment in 2010 because her then-husband had made $50,000 of estimated tax payments for 2010 with instructions that the amounts be applied to the taxpayer’s separate 2010 return. The IRS instead applied the payments to the husband’s separate account. While the agency and Tax Court proceedings were pending, the taxpayer filed several tax returns reflecting overpayments, which she wanted refunded to her. The IRS instead applied the taxpayer’s 2013-2016 and 2019 tax overpayments to her 2010 tax debt.

When the IRS had applied enough of the taxpayer’s later overpayments to extinguish her 2010 liability, the IRS moved to dismiss the Tax Court proceeding as moot, asserting that the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction because the IRS no longer had a basis to levy. The Tax Court agreed. The taxpayer appealed to the Third Circuit, which held for the taxpayer that the IRS’s abandonment of the levy did not moot the Tax Court proceedings. The IRS appealed to the Supreme Court, which reversed the Third Circuit.

The Court, in an opinion written by Justice Barrett in which seven other justices joined, held that the Tax Court, as a court of limited jurisdiction, only has jurisdiction under Code Sec. 6330(d)(1) to review a determination of an appeals officer in a collection due process hearing when the IRS is pursuing a levy. Once the IRS applied later overpayments to zero out the taxpayer’s liability and abandoned the levy process, the Tax Court no longer had jurisdiction over the case. Justice Gorsuch dissented, pointing out that the Court’s decision leaves the taxpayer without any resolution of the merits of her 2010 tax liability, and “hands the IRS a powerful new tool to avoid accountability for its mistakes in future cases like this one.”

Zuch, SCt

The Internal Revenue Service collected more than $5.1 trillion in gross receipts in fiscal year 2024. It is the first time the agency broke the $5 trillion mark, according to the 2024 Data Book, an annual publication that reviews IRS activities for the given fiscal year.

The Internal Revenue Service collected more than $5.1 trillion in gross receipts in fiscal year 2024.

It is the first time the agency broke the $5 trillion mark, according to the 2024 Data Book, an annual publication that reviews IRS activities for the given fiscal year. It was an increase over the $4.7 trillion collected in the previous fiscal year.

Individual tax, employment taxes, and real estate and trust income taxes accounted for $4.4 trillion of the fiscal 2024 gross collections, with the balance of $565 billion coming from businesses. The agency issued $120.1 billion in refunds, including $117.6 billion in individual income tax refunds and $428.4 billion in refunds to businesses.

The 2024 Data Book broke out statistics from the pilot year of the Direct File program, noting that 423,450 taxpayers logged into Direct File, with 140,803 using the program, which allows users to prepare and file their tax returns through the IRS website, to have their tax returns filed and accepted by the agency. Of the returns filed, 72 percent received a refund, with approximately $90 million in refunds issued to Direct File users. The IRS had gross collections of nearly $35.3 million (24 percent of filers using Direct File). The rest had a return with a $0 balance due.

Among the data highlighted in this year’s publication were service level improvements.

"The past two filing seasons saw continued improvement in IRS levels of service—one the phone, in person, and online—thanks to the efforts of our workforce and our use of long-term resources provided by Congress," IRS Acting Commissioner Michael Faulkender wrote. "In FY 2024, our customer service representatives answered approximately 20 million live phone calls. At our Taxpayer Assistance Centers around the country, we had more than 2 million contacts, increasing the in-person help we provided to taxpayers nearly 26 percent compared to FY 2023."

On the compliance side, the IRS reported in the 2024 Data Book that for all returns filed for Tax Years 2014 through 2022, the agency "has examined 0.40 percent of individual returns filed and 0.66 percent of corporation returns filed, as of the end of fiscal year 2024."

This includes examination of 7.9 percent of taxpayers filing individual returns reporting total positive incomes of $10 million or more. The IRS collected $29.0 billion from the 505,514 audits that were closed in FY 2024.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

IR-2025-63

The IRS has released guidance listing the specific changes in accounting method to which the automatic change procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, I.R.B. 2015- 5, 419, apply. The latest guidance updates and supersedes the current list of automatic changes found in Rev. Proc. 2024-23, I.R.B. 2024-23.

The IRS has released guidance listing the specific changes in accounting method to which the automatic change procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, I.R.B. 2015- 5, 419, apply. The latest guidance updates and supersedes the current list of automatic changes found in Rev. Proc. 2024-23, I.R.B. 2024-23.

Significant changes to the list of automatic changes made by this revenue procedure to Rev. Proc. 2024-23 include:

• (1) Section 6.22, relating to late elections under § 168(j)(8), § 168(l)(3)(D), and § 181(a)(1), is removed because the section is obsolete;
• (2) The following paragraphs, relating to the § 481(a) adjustment, are clarified by adding the phrase “for any taxable year in which the election was made” to the second sentence: (a) Paragraph (2) of section 3.07, relating to wireline network asset maintenance allowance and units of property methods of accounting under Rev. Proc. 2011-27; (b) Paragraph (2) of section 3.08, relating to wireless network asset maintenance allowance and units of property methods of accounting under Rev. Proc. 2011-28; and (c) Paragraph (3)(a) of section 3.11, relating to cable network asset capitalization methods of accounting under Rev. Proc. 2015-12;
• (3) Section 6.04, relating to a change in general asset account treatment due to a change in the use of MACRS property, is modified to remove section 6.04(2)(b), providing a temporary waiver of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(1)(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, because the provision is obsolete;
• (4) Section 6.05, relating to changes in method of accounting for depreciation due to a change in the use of MACRS property, is modified to remove section 6.05(2) (b), providing a temporary waiver of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(1)(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, because the provision is obsolete;
• (5) Section 6.13, relating to the disposition of a building or structural component (§ 168; § 1.168(i)-8), is clarified by adding the parenthetical “including the taxable year immediately preceding the year of change” to sections 6.13(3)(b), (c), (d), and (e), regarding certain covered changes under section 6.13;
• (6) Section 6.14, relating to dispositions of tangible depreciable assets (other than a building or its structural components) (§ 168; § 1.168(i)-8), is clarified by adding the parenthetical “including the taxable year immediately preceding the year of change” to sections 6.14(3)(b), (c), (d), and (e), regarding certain covered changes under section 6.14; June 9, 2025 1594 Bulletin No. 2025–24;
• (7) Section 7.01, relating to changes in method of accounting for SRE expenditures, is modified as follows. First, to remove section 7.01(3)(a), relating to changes in method of accounting for SRE expenditures for a year of change that is the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, because the provision is obsolete. Second, newly redesignated section 7.01(3)(a) (formerly section 7.01(3)(b)) is modified to remove the references to a year of change later than the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, because the language is obsolete;
• (8) Section 12.14, relating to interest capitalization, is modified to provide under section 12.14(1)(b) that the change under section 12.14 does not apply to a taxpayer that wants to change its method of accounting for interest to apply either: (1) current §§ 1.263A-11(e)(1)(ii) and (iii); or (2) proposed §§ 1.263A-8(d)(3) and 1.263A-11(e) and (f) (REG-133850-13), as published on May 15, 2024 (89 FR 42404) and corrected on July 24, 2024 (89 FR 59864);
• (9) Section 15.01, relating to a change in overall method to an accrual method from the cash method or from an accrual method with regard to purchases and sales of inventories and the cash method for all other items, is modified by removing the first sentence of section 15.01(5), disregarding any prior overall accounting method change to the cash method implemented using the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2001-10, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2011- 14, or Rev. Proc. 2002-28, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2011-14, for purposes of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(e) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, because the language is obsolete;
• (10) Section 15.08, relating to changes from the cash method to an accrual method for specific items, is modified to add new section 15.08(1)(b)(ix) to provide that the change under section 15.08 does not apply to a change in the method of accounting for any foreign income tax as defined in § 1.901-2(a);
• (11) Section 15.12, relating to farmers changing to the cash method, is clarified to provide that the change under section 15.12 is only applicable to a taxpayer’s trade or business of farming and not applicable to a non-farming trade or business the taxpayer might be engaged in;
• (11) Section 12.01, relating to certain uniform capitalization (UNICAP) methods used by resellers and reseller-producers, is modified as follows. First, to provide that section 12.01 applies to a taxpayer that uses a historic absorption ratio election with the simplified production method, the modified simplified production method, or the simplified resale method and wants to change to a different method for determining the additional Code Sec. 263A costs that must be capitalized to ending inventories or other eligible property on hand at the end of the taxable year (that is, to a different simplified method or a facts-and-circumstances method). Second, to remove the transition rule in section 12.01(1)(b)(ii)(B) because this language is obsolete;
• (12) Section 15.13, relating to nonshareholder contributions to capital under § 118, is modified to require changes under section 15.13(1)(a)(ii), relating to a regulated public utility under § 118(c) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (Dec. 22, 2017)) (“former § 118(c)”) that wants to change its method of accounting to exclude from gross income payments or the fair market value of property received that are contributions in aid of construction under former § 118(c), to be requested under the non-automatic change procedures provided in Rev. Proc. 2015- 13. Specifically, section 15.13(1)(a)(i), relating to a regulated public utility under former § 118(c) that wants to change its method of accounting to include in gross income payments received from customers as connection fees that are not contributions to the capital of the taxpayer under former § 118(c), is removed. Section 15.13(1)(a)(ii), relating to a regulated public utility under former § 118(c) that wants to change its method of accounting to exclude from gross income payments or the fair market value of property received that are contributions in aid of construction under former § 118(c), is removed. Section 15.13(2), relating to the inapplicability of the change under section 15.13(1) (a)(ii), is removed. Section 15.13(1)(b), relating to a taxpayer that wants to change its method of accounting to include in gross income payments or the fair market value of property received that do not constitute contributions to the capital of the taxpayer within the meaning of § 118 and the regulations thereunder, is modified by removing “(other than the payments received by a public utility described in former § 118(c) that are addressed in section 15.13(1)(a)(i) of this revenue procedure)” because a change under section 15.13(1)(a)(i) may now be made under newly redesignated section 15.13(1) of this revenue procedure;
• (13) Section 16.08, relating to changes in the timing of income recognition under § 451(b) and (c), is modified as follows. First, section 16.08 is modified to remove section 16.08(5)(a), relating to the temporary waiver of the eligibility rule in section 5.01(1)(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 for certain changes under section 16.08, because the provision is obsolete. Second, section 16.08 is modified to remove section 16.08(4)(a)(iv), relating to special § 481(a) adjustment rules when the temporary eligibility waiver applies, because the provision is obsolete. Third, section 16.08 is modified to remove sections 16.08(4)(a) (v)(C) and 16.08(4)(a)(v)(D), providing examples to illustrate the special § 481(a) adjustment rules under section 16.08(4)(a) (iv), because the examples are obsolete;
• (14) Section 19.01, relating to changes in method of accounting for certain exempt long-term construction contracts from the percentage-of-completion method of accounting to an exempt contract method described in § 1.460-4(c), or to stop capitalizing costs under § 263A for certain home construction contracts, is modified by removing the references to “proposed § 1.460-3(b)(1)(ii)” in section 19.01(1), relating to the inapplicability of the change under section 19.01, because the references are obsolete;
• (15) Section 19.02, relating to changes in method of accounting under § 460 to rely on the interim guidance provided in section 8 of Notice 2023-63, 2023-39 I.R.B. 919, is modified to remove section 19.02(3)(a), relating to a change in the treatment of SRE expenditures under § 460 for the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2021, because the provision is obsolete;
• (16) Section 20.07, relating to changes in method of accounting for liabilities for rebates and allowances to the recurring item exception under § 461(h)(3), is clarified by adding new section 20.07(1)(b) (ii), providing that a change under section 20.07 does not apply to liabilities arising from reward programs;
• (17) The following sections, relating to the inapplicability of the relevant change, are modified to remove the reference to “proposed § 1.471-1(b)” because this reference is obsolete: (a) Section 22.01(2), relating to cash discounts; (b) Section 22.02(2), relating to estimating inventory “shrinkage”; (c) Section 22.03(2), relating to qualifying volume-related trade discounts; (d) Section 22.04(1)(b)(iii), relating to impermissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories; (e) Section 22.05(1)(b)(ii), relating to the core alternative valuation method; Bulletin No. 2025–24 1595 June 9, 2025 (f) Section 22.06(2), relating to replacement cost for automobile dealers’ parts inventory; (g) Section 22.07(2), relating to replacement cost for heavy equipment dealers’ parts inventory; (h) Section 22.08(2), relating to rotable spare parts; (i) Section 22.09(3), relating to the advanced trade discount method; (j) Section 22.10(1)(b)(iii), relating to permissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories; (k) Section 22.11(2), relating to a change in the official used vehicle guide utilized in valuing used vehicles; (l) Section 22.12(2), relating to invoiced advertising association costs for new vehicle retail dealerships; (m) Section 22.13(2), relating to the rolling-average method of accounting for inventories; (n) Section 22.14(2), relating to sales-based vendor chargebacks; (o) Section 22.15(2), relating to certain changes to the cost complement of the retail inventory method; (p) Section 22.16(2), relating to certain changes within the retail inventory method; and (q) Section 22.17(1)(b)(iii), relating to changes from currently deducting inventories to permissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories; and
• (18) Section 22.10, relating to permissible methods of identification and valuation of inventories, is modified to remove section 22.10(1)(d).

Subject to a transition rule, this revenue procedure is effective for a Form 3115 filed on or after June 9, 2025, for a year of change ending on or after October 31, 2024, that is filed under the automatic change procedures of Rev. Proc. 2015-13, 2015-5 I.R.B. 419, as clarified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2015-33, 2015-24 I.R.B. 1067, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2021-34, 2021-35 I.R.B. 337, Rev. Proc. 2021-26, 2021-22 I.R.B. 1163, Rev. Proc. 2017-59, 2017-48 I.R.B. 543, and section 17.02(b) and (c) of Rev. Proc. 2016-1, 2016-1 I.R.B. 1 .

Rev. Proc. 2025-23

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued Notice 2025-33, extending and modifying transition relief for brokers required to report digital asset transactions using Form 1099-DA, Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions. The notice builds upon the temporary relief previously provided in Notice 2024-56 and allows additional time for brokers to comply with reporting requirements.

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued Notice 2025-33, extending and modifying transition relief for brokers required to report digital asset transactions using Form 1099-DA, Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions. The notice builds upon the temporary relief previously provided in Notice 2024-56 and allows additional time for brokers to comply with reporting requirements.

Reporting Requirements and Transitional Relief

In 2024, final regulations were issued requiring brokers to report digital asset sale and exchange transactions on Form 1099-DA, furnish payee statements, and backup withhold on certain transactions beginning January 1, 2025. Notice 2024-56 provided general transitional relief, including limited relief from backup withholding for certain sales of digital assets during 2026 for brokers using the IRS’s TIN-matching system in place of certified TINs.

Additional Transition Relief from Backup Withholding, Customers Not Previously Classified as U.S. Persons

Under Notice 2025-33, transition relief from backup withholding tax liability and associated penalties is extended for any broker that fails to withhold and pay the backup withholding tax for any digital asset sale or exchange transaction effected during calendar year 2026.

Brokers will not be required to backup withhold for any digital asset sale or exchange transactions effected in 2027 when they verify customer information through the IRS Tax Information Number (TIN) Matching Program. To qualify, brokers must submit a customer's name and tax identification number to the matching service and receive confirmation that the information corresponds with IRS records.

Additionally, penalties that apply to brokers that fail to withhold and pay the full backup withholding due are limited with respect to any decrease in the value of received digital assets between the time of the transaction giving rise to the backup withholding obligation and the time the broker liquidates 24 percent of a customer’s received digital assets.

Finally, the notice also provides additional transition relief for brokers for sales of digital assets effected during calendar year 2027 for certain preexisting customers. This relief applies when brokers have not previously classified these customers as U.S. persons and the customer files contain only non-U.S. residence addresses.

Notice 2025-33

IR-2025-67

The IRS failed to establish that it issued a valid notice of deficiency to an individual under Code Sec. 6212(b). Thus, the Tax Court dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction.

The IRS failed to establish that it issued a valid notice of deficiency to an individual under Code Sec. 6212(b). Thus, the Tax Court dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction.

The taxpayer filed a petition to seek re-determination of a deficiency for the tax year at issue. The IRS moved to dismiss the petition under Code Sec. 6213(a), contending that it was untimely and that Code Sec. 7502’s "timely mailed, timely filed" rule did not apply. However, the Court determined that the notice of deficiency had not been properly addressed to the individual’s last known address.

Although the individual attached a copy of the notice to the petition, the Court found that the significant 400-day delay in filing did not demonstrate timely, actual receipt sufficient to cure the defect. Because the IRS could not establish that a valid notice was issued, the Court concluded that the 90-day deadline under Code Sec. 6213(a) was never triggered, and Code Sec. 7502 was inapplicable.

L.C.I. Cano, TC Memo. 2025-65, Dec. 62,679(M)

A limited partnership classified as a TEFRA partnership was not entitled to exclude its limited partners’ distributive shares from net earnings from self-employment under Code Sec. 1402(a)(13). The Tax Court found that the individuals materially participated in the partnership’s investment management business and were not acting as limited partners “as such.”

A limited partnership classified as a TEFRA partnership was not entitled to exclude its limited partners’ distributive shares from net earnings from self-employment under Code Sec. 1402(a)(13). The Tax Court found that the individuals materially participated in the partnership’s investment management business and were not acting as limited partners “as such.”

Furthermore, the Court concluded that the limited partners’ roles were indistinguishable from those of active general partners. Accordingly, their distributive shares were includible in net earnings from self-employment under Code Sec. 1402(a) and subject to tax under Code Sec. 1401. The taxpayer’s argument that the partners’ actions were authorized solely through the general partner was found unpersuasive. The Court emphasized substance over form and found that the partners’ conduct and economic relationship with the firm were determinative.

Additionally, the Court held that the taxpayer failed to meet the requirements under Code Sec. 7491(a) to shift the burden of proof because it did not establish compliance with substantiation and net worth requirements. Lastly, the Tax Court also upheld the IRS’s designation of the general partner LLC as the proper tax matters partner under Code Sec. 6231(a)(7)(B), finding that the attempted designation of a limited partner was invalid because an eligible general partner existed and had the legal authority to serve.

Soroban Capital Partners LP, TC Memo. 2025-52, Dec. 62,665(M)