In a normal year, March is the busiest month in our office. The April 15th tax filing deadline means we have a full team on site working through tax returns and clients visiting us daily. This is NOT a normal year. The COVID-19 pandemic is changing the way the world works and we have had to adjust our business operations as well. We wanted to provide an update on what we are doing to try to be there for each of you in these trying times, while also keeping everyone as safe as possible. 

March 23, 2020

In a normal year, March is the busiest month in our office. The April 15th tax filing deadline means we have a full team on site working through tax returns and clients visiting us daily. This is NOT a normal year. The COVID-19 pandemic is changing the way the world works and we have had to adjust our business operations as well. We wanted to provide an update on what we are doing to try to be there for each of you in these trying times, while also keeping everyone as safe as possible. 

At this time Governor Lamont has deemed us to be an essential service.  Unless further restrictions are put into place, our office will be open Monday – Friday from 9AM, - 5PM; however, we cannot hold any client meetings, conferences or in person review/signing of tax returns.  While we are open, we encourage everyone to follow the recommendations of the health experts and limit your trips out of your home and practice safe social distancing.  We encourage the use of priority mail, Federal Express/UPS, telephone, fax, email, scanning and our portal site.  If you need to drop off or pick up, please follow the process in place:

DROP OFF – Plastic Bin inside our door (label outside of package with your name)

PICK UP – Notify office of your expected day and time, package will be available at the counter

The tax deadline for Federal, CT and NY has been extended from April 15, 2020 to July 15, 2020 for most return types.  Many other states have done the same.  Information is quite fluid at this time so we will share it as it becomes available.

Due to the current situation, we know it may be difficult for you to sign the 8879 forms and return them to us to indicate we have your approval to efile.  As a result we are allowing clients facing these circumstances to email us the following as a substitute for signing the 8879 if they cannot return the form:  “ (Specify Name(s)) have reviewed my/our 2019 tax returns and are in agreement as prepared to efile them today (specify date)”.  We will then attach your email to the 8879 form as your signature.

If your returns are complete or significant work has been completed but you choose not to file currently due to the extended filing deadline, we may invoice you for progress work.  Upon filing, you will receive a supplemental invoice for processing work and fees.

There is much that is out of our control right now so it's important to focus on what you can control. Practice safe social distancing, wash your hands, check in on those most at risk and be kind to each other. This is a scary time but we will get through this together. 

Thank you for your cooperation, support and patience at this unprecedented time in the world –

Walter J. McKeever & Company, LLC

The Tax Organizers to assist in compiling the information necessary to prepare your 2019 individual income tax return(s) were mailed early to mid-January 2020. Please complete the organizer to the best of your ability. In connection with all items of income, if married, please indicate whether the income is the taxpayer, spouse or joint (TSJ).  Please contact us if you haven't received your 2019 Tax Organizer or if you would like a blank version.

The Tax Organizers to assist in compiling the information necessary to prepare your 2019 individual income tax return(s) were mailed early to mid-January 2020. Please complete the organizer to the best of your ability. In connection with all items of income, if married, please indicate whether the income is the taxpayer, spouse or joint (TSJ).  Please contact us if you haven't received your 2019 Tax Organizer or if you would like a blank version.

The Internal Revenue Service and State Taxing Authorities are matching information returns submitted by businesses, employers and financial institutions with amounts reported on individual tax returns.  Negligence penalties may be assessed when income is underreported. Please be certain to mail or bring with you all of the following original unstapled forms as well as your Organizer (Form # is shown in the upper right-hand corner of the Organizer):

1) Dependent information including names, relationship, date of birth and social security numbers (if a dependent is no longer a student please indicate) (Forms 3 and 3A).  Please remember that names and social security numbers must match exactly in order for the dependent to be allowed.

2) All W-2 forms for wages (Form 3A).

3) All 1099 forms for interest, dividends, sales of securities, pension / IRA distributions, social security benefits, commissions and other income received as well as brokerage statements and realized gain/loss schedules (Forms 5A, 5B, 5EA, 7, 9, 9A and 13).  If you have a foreign bank account, please list it and all applicable information on Form 5C.  Congress has been sharply focused on requiring taxpayer reporting of foreign bank/financial accounts and assets for the last several years.  Besides filing the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, information may be required to be attached to the taxpayer's income tax return for those assets with aggregate values exceeding specific thresholds.  If applicable, you will be requested to provide additional information. 

NOTE: Form 114 FinCEN (previously known as Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) (FBAR) must be electronically filed via the BSA E-Filing System.  Our firm can assist you with the preparation and submission of the electronic FBARs; however, the primary responsibility for this filing remains with the taxpayer.  2019 FBAR filings are due April 15, 2020 with a maximum extension for a 6- month period ending October 15, 2020 to file.

4) All notices from corporations, financial institutions or mutual funds that advise of special tax treatment for earnings.

5) Report of tax-exempt interest and dividends received (Form 5A, 5B and 5EA) with payer identification.

6) Supporting information (including 1099 MISC forms) for business income and expenses (Forms 6, 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D).  For business use of your home, please include the square footage of your home used exclusively for business as well as total square footage of your home on Form 6D (this is required information).

7) Copies of closing statements for any real estate, co-op or condominium purchases or sales which occurred during the year and a copy of the Form 1099B received for gross proceeds (Form 8).  Please remember to include the acquisition date of the property sold, the original cost and improvements. 

8) All 5498 forms and support for 2019 retirement contributions made to date or anticipated to be made for the 2019 tax year (Form 9 and 9A).  Please indicate on Form 9 if you want maximum contribution limits calculated.

9) All 1098 and 1099 MISC forms supporting rental income and expenses (Forms 10 and 10A).  Please be sure to include details for all improvements made and capital assets purchased including acquisition dates.

10) All Schedule K-1 forms (Form 11) from partnerships, limited liability companies, S corporations, trusts and estates including all supporting literature received including state specific K-1s and transmittal/cover letters.

11) All 1099G forms (Form 13) issued/received from State Taxing Authorities.  These forms are available from Connecticut and New York online only. 

12) Adjustments to Income (Forms 13 and 13A) – please be sure to include educator expenses, alimony paid/received, health savings account contributions/distributions and student loan interest paid including all 1098-E forms.  For Health Savings Accounts, please include a statement(s) and 1099 forms that recap the 2019 activity in order to verify the beginning and ending balances of the account.

13) Real estate and personal property taxes paid – please be sure to include only taxes paid during the calendar year 2019.

14) All 1098 forms for interest expense deductions - Please identify for each 1098 form if the loan interest paid is for a home mortgage (secured by principal residence or vacation home) or investment activity (Form 14A).  If your total debt exceeds $1 million, please include the balance of each loan at January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019.  In addition, please supply new home acquisition balances from December 15, 2017 and beyond if the debt exceeds $750,000.  NOTE: With respect to home mortgages, please note the question on Form 2C should also reference new home mortgages incurred after December 15, 2017 and whether the loan balance exceeds $750,000. See tax planning letter for more details.

15) Contributions (Form 15 - See note on top of the form) – be careful in reporting your contributions as the IRS is aggressively challenging those which appear to be excessive in dollars and valuation.  Please include supporting documentation for cash contributions with values in excess of $250 and noncash contributions with values that exceed $500.

16) Child/Dependent care expenses (Form 18) – Please provide the name, address and social security # and/or employer identification # of the providers as this is required.

17) Household Employment Taxes (Form 19) including W-2 forms for wages paid and quarterly state unemployment returns filed for the 2019 tax year.

18) A schedule of estimated taxes paid (Forms 20 and 20A) for federal and state income taxes including payments made in January 2020 for the 2019 tax year and payments made in January 2019 for the 2018 tax year.  Please be sure to include the date for each payment made.

19) All W-2G forms (Form 13) for gambling winnings.

20) IMPORTANT: (Form 2) Notification received from providers documenting the existence of health insurance coverage for 2019 for you, your spouse and/or dependents. (include Forms 1095-A, 1095-B and/or 1095-C as applicable).

21) Copies of any notices or other communications received during the year from the Internal Revenue Service and State Taxing Authorities.

22) Identity Protection Personal Identification Number (Form 3A) – If you have received notification that an IP PIN has been assigned to you and/or your spouse by the IRS, it is imperative that this information be provided to us with your tax documents as you cannot efile your income tax return without it and our firm has no access to this information.

Because of government enforcement regulations and fraud prevention initiatives, we are requesting that you include copies of the social security cards for yourself, spouse and dependents.  If you provided us with copies of social security cards in the past, you do not have to provide it again; however, the driver’s license and passports on file must be current.  Also, if you are a new client to the firm, include a copy of the current driver’s license for yourself and your spouse as we are required to input the current information in order to electronically file. If you have any questions, please call our office to verify your information on file.  Please review and correct, if necessary, the personal and dependent information, including dates of birth on Forms 3 and 3A. The spelling of names must match the social security cards issued or correspondence from the IRS will be generated.  Returns cannot be filed electronically if discrepancies exist between the tax return and the Social Security Administration.  Refunds will not be issued until the matter is resolved. 

When completing Form 7 in the Tax Organizer, Sales of Stocks, Securities, Capital Assets & Installment Sales, special care should be taken in providing complete and accurate information, especially acquisition dates and cost. For re-investment programs, such as mutual funds and dividend reinvestment programs, it is necessary to provide all data since initial acquisition unless the fund/broker provides the cost information.  Taxpayers are required to complete Form 8949, Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets, along with Schedule D to report this activity.  Form 8949 captures the detail data of each individual sales transaction in conjunction with cost basis information as reported by your broker/financial institution under reporting regulations.

In order to continue providing quality service on a timely basis, we urge you to collect your information as soon as possible.  If information from a “pass-through” entity such as a partnership, S corporation, limited liability company, trust or estate is the only data you are missing, please send the data you have assembled and forward the missing information as soon as it is available. Please clearly indicate which information is missing.  If we do not receive your complete information by March 23, 2020, we cannot guarantee timely completion of your tax returns for the April 15, 2020 filing deadline.  

After completing the Tax Organizer, please sign and date the COVER SHEET before returning it to our office.  Please be sure to include all of your contact information on the COVER SHEET as well - telephone numbers, fax numbers and email addresses, if applicable and the preferred method of contact.

If you or your spouse worked in New York with your residence outside of New York or you worked in Connecticut with your residence outside of Connecticut, please complete the enclosed allocation of wage and salary income.  If you held multiple jobs during the year, please provide a separate allocation schedule for each job.

Two full years have passed since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was signed into law.  Over the last two years, the IRS and Treasury have released a considerable amount of guidance in the form of both proposed and final regulations.  While some of this guidance has been taxpayer friendly, not all of the proposed regulations yield favorable results.  As we approach year end, taxpayers continue to seek additional clarity about areas where temporary regulations might affect their individual returns.

Two full years have passed since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was signed into law.  Over the last two years, the IRS and Treasury have released a considerable amount of guidance in the form of both proposed and final regulations.  While some of this guidance has been taxpayer friendly, not all of the proposed regulations yield favorable results.  As we approach year end, taxpayers continue to seek additional clarity about areas where temporary regulations might affect their individual returns.

The following is a discussion of the rules applicable to the filing of 2019 individual income taxes.

TAX RATES - For 2019 there are seven income tax brackets ranging between 10% and 37% for ordinary income.  The 37% tax bracket is imposed on taxable income over threshold amounts as follows:

• $612,350 for married taxpayers filing jointly and surviving spouses
• $306,175 for married taxpayers filing separately
• $510,300 for heads of households
• $510,300 for single taxpayers

For 2020, there are still seven brackets and the 37% tax bracket is imposed on taxable income over the following thresholds:

• $622,050 for married taxpayers filing jointly and surviving spouses
• $311,025 for married taxpayers filing separately
• $518,400 for heads of households
• $518,400 for single taxpayers

These rates apply, absent new legislation, to all years until December 31, 2025.

Besides the reduction in rates and expansion of the tax brackets, perhaps the biggest change to deductions was the elimination of the personal exemption effective 2018.  This is to be offset, in part, by the increase in the standard deduction.  For 2019, the standard deduction has essentially been doubled to $12,200 for single taxpayers and $24,400 for married couples filing jointly.  For 2020, the standard deduction is $12,400 for single taxpayers and $24,800 for married filing jointly.

On December 28, 2018 New York State Department of Taxation issued a Technical Memorandum stating that they decoupled from certain personal income tax IRS changes for 2018 and after implemented via TCJA.  These items include certain itemized deductions, alimony or separate maintenance payments, qualified moving expenses reimbursement and moving expenses, Empire State child tax credit and New York 529 college savings account withdrawals.

LONG TERM CAPITAL GAINS AND QUALIFYING DIVIDENDS TAX RATE – The favorable rate of 0% for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% brackets remains unchanged from 2017.  In the TCJA, these rates apply at different thresholds for 2019 and 2020 as follows:

• The 0% tax rate applies to adjusted net capital gain up to $78,750 and $80,000 for joint filers and surviving spouses, $52,750 and $53,600 for heads of household, $39,375 and $40,000 for single filers, $39,375 and $40,000 for married taxpayers filing separately and $2,650 and $2,650 for estates and trusts;
• The 15% tax rate applies to adjusted net capital gain over the amount subject to the 0% rate, and up to $488,850 and $496,600 for joint filers and surviving spouses, $461,700 and $469,500 for heads of household, $434,550 and $425,800 for single filers, $244,425 and $248,300 for married taxpayers filing separately, and $12,950 and $13,150 for estates and trusts; and
• The 20% tax rate applies to adjusted net capital gain over $488,850 and $496,601 for joint filers and surviving spouses, $461,700 and $469,051 for heads of household, $434,500 and $441,451 for single filers, $244,425 and $248,300 for married taxpayers filing separately, and $12,950 and $12,950 for estates and trusts.

Remaining unchanged from prior years is the 25% rate for unrecaptured Code Sec. 1250 gain, the 28% rate for collectibles and gain on qualified small business stock equal to its partial exclusion.

Qualified dividends received from domestic corporations and qualified foreign corporations continue to be taxed at the same rates that apply to capital gains.  Certain dividends do not qualify for the reduced rates, including dividends paid by credit unions, mutual insurance companies, and farmers’ cooperatives.

NET INVESTMENT INCOME TAX (NIIT) – An additional Medicare surtax of 3.8% is imposed on the lesser of net investment income (NII) or modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) above a specified threshold.  However, the Medicare surtax is not imposed on income derived from a trade or business, nor from the sale of property used in a trade or business.

NII includes the following investment income reduced by certain investment-related expenses, such as investment interest expense, investment brokerage fees, royalty related expenses, and state and local taxes allocable to items included in net investment income:

• Gross income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents, provided this income is not derived in the ordinary course of an active trade or business
• Gross income from a trade or business that is a passive activity
• Gross income from a trade or business of trading in financial instruments or commodities
• Gain from the disposition of property, other than property held in an active trade or business

Individuals are subject to the 3.8% NIIT if their MAGI exceeds the following thresholds (which are not adjusted for inflation):

• $250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly or a qualifying widower with a dependent child
• $125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately
• $200,000 for single and head of household taxpayers

ADDITIONAL HI (MEDICARE) TAX - Higher income (HI) individuals continue to be subject to an additional 0.9% HI (Medicare) tax, not to be confused with the 3.8% Medicare surtax on NIIT. The additional Medicare tax means that the portion of wages received in connection with employment in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly and $125,000 for married couples filing separately) is subject to a 2.35% Medicare tax rate (normal 1.45% plus additional .9%). The additional Medicare tax also applies to self-employed individuals.   

ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX (AMT) – The TCJA temporarily increased the Alternative minimum tax (AMT) exemption amounts for 2019 and 2020 as follows:

• $111,700 for married taxpayers filing jointly and surviving spouses for 2019 and $113,400 for 2020
• $71,700 for unmarried taxpayers and heads of household, other than surviving spouses, for 2019 and $72,900 for 2020
• $55,850 for married taxpayers filing separately for 2019 and $56,700 for 2020

Exemptions for the AMT are phased out as taxpayers reach high levels of alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI). Generally, the exemption amounts are phased out by an amount equal to 25% of the amount by which an individual’s AMTI exceeds a threshold level.  The threshold amounts for calculating the exemption phase-out are adjusted for inflation as follows:

• $1,020,600 in 2019 and $1,036,800 in 2020 for married taxpayers filing jointly and surviving spouses
• $510,300 in 2019 and $518,400 in 2020 for unmarried taxpayers and heads of household, other than surviving spouses
• $510,300 in 2019 and $518,400 in 2020 for married taxpayers filing separately

For 2019 and 2020, the AMT rates are 26% and 28% on the excess of AMTI over the applicable exemption amount. You should not ignore the possibility of being subject to the AMT as it can negate certain year-end tax strategies; however, tax planning strategies can be used to reduce its impact. As a general rule, taxpayers subject to AMT should accelerate income into AMT years and postpone deductions into non-AMT years.

STOCK LOSSES – Taxpayers should continually review their investments for return and portfolio balance.  They should monitor their investments to take steps necessary to time the recognition of capital gains and losses to minimize their net capital gains tax and maximize the benefit of capital losses.  Remember for tax purposes it is not how much your investments have gone up or down in value but rather how much gain or loss you have realized when an investment is sold since its original purchase date.  The maximum capital loss deduction available to offset ordinary income is $3,000 ($1,500 for married taxpayers filing separately) with the additional capital losses being carried forward until used.  Taxpayers also need to take “wash sale” rules into consideration when generating losses.  The wash sale rule defers use of a tax loss realized upon a sale of stock if the investor repurchases it within 30 days before or after the sale.  Worthless stock also generates an immediate capital loss; however, the rules for “worthless” stocks are very strict.  Stocks and securities must be totally worthless for a taxpayer to take a loss deduction; a mere decrease in value, no matter how great, will not trigger a loss deduction.

ROTH IRA CONVERSIONS - Modified gross income limitations applicable to Roth IRA conversions were repealed and 2010 was the first year in which a taxpayer could convert all or part of their traditional retirement accounts to a Roth account, regardless of income, age or filing status.  A conversion is a taxable transfer and is taxable in the year of conversion.  Under prior law, a Taxpayer could recharacterize IRA contributions from one type of IRA to another.  TCJA provides that a recharacterization cannot be used to unwind a Roth conversion. A taxpayer may still make a contribution to a traditional IRA and convert the Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA but the change is that the Roth conversion can then not be unwound using recharacterization.

IRA & ROTH IRA CONTRIBUTIONS – The maximum contribution is $6,000 for 2019 and 2020 provided you have at least $6,000 respectively of wage, salary or net self-employment earnings.  An additional “catch-up” contribution of $1,000 is allowed for taxpayers over 50 years of age by the end of the tax year for 2019 and 2020.  Contributions to a Roth IRA may continue after age 70 1/2 (by the end of the tax year) but not to a traditional IRA.  Remember that IRA and Roth IRA contributions for the 2019 tax year can be made up to April 15, 2020.

401K AND 403B CONTRIBUTIONS - The annual limit on employee elective deferrals to these plans for 2019 is $19,000 and $19,500 for 2020.  The maximum “catch-up” contribution to a 401K and 403B plan for taxpayers over 50 years of age by the end of the tax year is an additional $6,000 for 2019 and $6,500 for 2020.

CHILD DEPENDENT CARE (CDC) CREDIT – For 2019, the maximum amount of qualifying expenses to which the credit may be applied is $3,000 for individuals with one qualifying child or dependent (for a maximum credit of $1,050) or $6,000 for individuals with two or more qualifying children or dependents (for a maximum credit of $2,100).  For taxpayers with AGI between $15,000 and $43,000, the 35% credit rate is reduced by 1% for each $2,000 of AGI until the credit percentage is 20% for taxpayers with AGI of $43,000.

CHILD TAX CREDIT (CTC) – Beginning in 2018, the CTC doubled to $2,000 for each qualifying child under the age of 17.  For example, a taxpayer with two qualifying children will be entitled to a credit of $4,000.  The refundable portion of the credit is increased to a maximum amount of $1,400 per qualifying child.  In addition, the earned income threshold for determining refund ability is decreased to $2,500 (from the $3,000 amount that was in effect before TCJA was enacted).  A qualifying child must have a Social Security Number to be eligible for the CTC. 

Taxpayers are allowed a $500 credit per qualifying person for any dependents who are not eligible for CTC.  Eligibility is subject to certain rules including the tax tests for dependency.

For 2019, the total credit amount allowed to a married couple filing jointly is reduced by $50 for every $1,000 (or part of a $1,000) by which their AGI exceeds $400,000.  The threshold is $200,000 for all other taxpayers.  So, if you were previously prohibited from taking the credit because your AGI was too high, you may now be eligible to claim the credit.

EDUCATION INCENTIVES – The following are education incentives which exist under current law. 

American Opportunity Tax Credit: The American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC) was made permanent by the 2015 PATH Act and was not changed by TCJA.  This $2,500 maximum credit per eligible student is subject to the higher income phase-out ranges of $80,000 to $90,000 for single filers ($160,000 to $180,000 for joint filers) and contains a 40% refundable credit component.  The eligibility extension to the first four years of post-secondary education contains an inclusion for text books and course materials as eligible expenses. The Lifetime Learning Credit was also retained.

Student Loan Interest Deduction: If your modified adjusted gross income during 2019 is less than $85,000 ($170,000 for married filing jointly), a deduction is allowed for interest paid on a student loan used for higher education up to a maximum of $2,500.  This figure will continue to be adjusted each year for inflation. 

Coverdell Education Savings Accounts (ESAs): Total contributions for the beneficiary of this account cannot exceed $2,000 in any year no matter how many accounts have been established.  Contributions to a Coverdell ESA are not deductible but amounts deposited in the account grow tax free until distributed.

Employer-Provided Education Assistance: Employees are allowed to exclude from gross income and wages up to $5,250 in annual educational assistance provided under an employer's nondiscriminatory "educational assistance plan." 

Scholarship Programs: An amount received as a qualified scholarship and used for qualified tuition and related expenses is excludable from income.  The exclusion does not apply to any portion of the amount received which represents payment for teaching, research, or other services by the student as a required condition for receiving the qualified scholarship.  However, scholarship recipients with obligatory service requirements under the National Health Service Corps Scholarship Program and the Armed Forces Scholarship Program can exclude from income qualified tuition and related expenses as well as amounts that represent payment for services.

Section 529 Accounts:  TCJA expanded potential usage of 529 Plans to include elementary and secondary school tuition for public, private and religious schools up to $10,000 per year per student.  Previously, only Coverdell ESA funds could be used for primary and secondary expenses.  New York opted not to follow TCJA; therefore, for New York purposes, withdrawals for kindergarten through 12^th grade school tuition are NOT qualified withdrawals under the New York 529 college savings account program.

MEDICAL EXPENSE THRESHOLD -  For tax years beginning after December 31, 2018, a deduction will be allowed for the expenses paid during the tax year for the medical care of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse and the taxpayer’s dependents to the extent the expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income through the end of 2020.  In 2021, the 7.5% will move up to 10%.  Prior to the last minute tax law changes signed right before the new year, the 2019 threshold was supposed to be 10% of adjusted gross income.

CHARITABLE GIVING –

• Congress has long used the tax laws to encourage charitable giving and for many individuals, charitable giving is also a part of their year-end tax strategy. The PATH Act of 2015 made permanent the popular charitable giving incentive with tax-free IRA distributions to public charities by individuals age 70 1/2 and older up to a maximum of $100,000 per qualified taxpayer per year. Individuals taking this option cannot claim a deduction for the charitable gift as the distribution is not claimed as income.
• Congress tightened the rules for substantiation requirements for charitable contributions effective August 17, 2006. The IRS will not allow charitable deductions, regardless of the amount, without proper documentation. Contributions of $250 or more must be substantiated by a written acknowledgement from the donee organization; the acknowledgement must include the date of the donation, amount of cash or a description of property donated and a description and good faith estimate of the value of any goods or services received in exchange for the contribution.  If the donor does not receive a written acknowledgment from a charitable organization, it is the donor’s responsibility to obtain it in order to claim the charitable contribution.  Contributions under $250 must be substantiated by cancelled checks, bank records or receipts from the donee organization.  If it would be impracticable to obtain a receipt, the donor must maintain reliable written records. 
• Just like the rules for cash gifts, the rules for substantiating deductions for donations of clothing and household items (i.e. furniture, furnishings, electronics, appliances) were tightened after August 17, 2006 and will only be allowed if the property is in “good used condition or better”. Donors must have a written acknowledgement from the charity documenting the donation date, description of property donated, a description and good faith estimate of the value of any goods or services received in exchange for the contribution and a valuation/qualified appraisal of the property donated, if applicable.  A deduction for the noncash goods will be allowed, without regard to condition, only if a qualified appraisal is attached to the return for each single item or group of similar items over $500.  We recommend that pictures be taken of any noncash goods that are donated as it will be helpful in supporting the deduction.

Taxpayers donating vehicles (i.e. car, truck, boat, and aircraft) to a charity valued over $500 must obtain from the charity and attach to the tax return Form 1098-C and/or a written acknowledgment of the contribution.  The donation amount is usually limited to the gross proceeds from the sale of the vehicle by the charity.

Gifting of appreciated securities for making charitable contributions continues to be a significant alternative instead of using cash.  In this manner, the appreciated value will not be taxed, low cost basis stock is removed from your portfolio/estate and the fair-market value of the security will be used as the charitable contribution.

IRS has been aggressively reviewing and challenging charitable donations in response to these new substantiation requirements.  It is expected that this trend will continue.  The burden of proof will be on the taxpayer so it is imperative that good records and supporting documentation is maintained.

EDUCATOR EXPENSES – The 2015 PATH Act permanently extended the teacher's classroom expense deduction that allows primary and secondary education professionals to deduct (above-the-line) qualified expenses up to $250 paid out-of-pocket during the year.  Eligible expenses in excess of the $250 limit are no longer deductible as a miscellaneous itemized deduction on Schedule A.  Even though the $250 limit is subject to adjustment for inflation, it remains the same for 2019 and 2020.

BONUS DEPRECIATION & SECTION 179 BUSINESS EXPENSING ELECTIONS –

Bonus Depreciation: Pursuant to TCJA for qualified purchases placed into service after September 27, 2017, 100% of the purchase price can be expensed. This 100% expensing will continue until 2022.  There is a scheduled phase-down to 80% starting in 2023 and ending at 20% in 2026, after which the provision is set to expire.  Unlike regular depreciation, where half year and mid quarter conventions may apply, a taxpayer is entitled to the full 100% bonus depreciation based on when the asset is purchased. Therefore, year-end placed in service strategies provide immediate “cash discount” for qualifying purchases, even when considering finance costs.

Bonus depreciation under old law is available only for new property (i.e. property whose original use begins with the taxpayer) depreciable under MACRS that (a) has a recovery period of 20 years or less, (b) is MACRS water utility property, (c) is computer software depreciable over three years, or (d) is qualified leasehold improvement property. An enticing provision under the new law whereby qualified property includes property that has been used (i.e. the original use does not have to originate with the purchaser).  A taxpayer may elect out of bonus depreciation with respect to any class of property placed in service during the tax year. Although this election may be factored into a year-end strategy, a final decision on making it is not required until the tax return is filed. Bonus depreciation is not a preference item for alternative minimum tax.

Code Sec. 179 Expensing: The PATH Act’s provisions made the enhanced Section 179 expense deduction permanent for taxpayers (other than estates, trusts or certain non-corporate lessors) that elect to treat the cost of qualifying property (generally defined as depreciable tangible property that is purchased for use in an active trade or business) as an expense rather than a capital expenditure. Thus, the current Section 179 dollar cap for 2019 and 2020 is $1,020,000 and $1,040,000 with an overall investment limitation of $2,550,000 and $2,590,000.

Revised Repair/Capitalization Rules: IRS issued comprehensive final rules on the treatment of payments to acquire, produce or improve tangible property.  Beginning January 1, 2014, businesses were required to use these new rules in determining whether they can deduct their costs as repairs under Code Section 162(a) or must capitalize the costs, to be recovered over a period of years under Code Section 263(a).

A relatively new election that is available for “de minimis” asset purchases if certain requirements are met.  When this election is in place, your business may simply expense that which falls below a specified level to the extent that the amounts are deducted for financial accounting purposes or in keeping with your books and records.  The de minimis threshold can be up to $5,000 (per invoice or per item as substantiated on the invoice) if your business has financial statements audited by an independent certified public accountant (CPA) or issued to a state or federal agency.  The threshold is $2,500 for firms without such financial statements.

AUTOMOBILE MILEAGE RATE - Many taxpayers use the standard mileage rates to help simplify their recordkeeping. Using the business standard mileage rate takes the place of deducting the applicable business percentage of the actual costs of your vehicle such as maintenance and repairs, gas and oil, insurance, license and registration fees.  If you choose to use the actual expense method to calculate your business vehicle deduction, you must maintain very careful records by keeping track of the actual costs during the year to maintain and run your vehicle.  One of the most important tools is a mileage log book that details date, miles driven, location and purpose for the vehicle during the calendar year.  Our office can help you compare the benefits of using the business standard mileage rate or the actual expense method.

Business standard mileage rate: The business standard mileage rate for 2019 is 58.00 cents per mile.  The 2020 rate is 57.50 cents per mile. 

Medical/Moving standard mileage rate: The medical/moving standard mileage rate for 2019 is 20.00 cents per mile.  The 2020 rate is 17.00 cents per mile. 

Charitable standard mileage rate:   Taxpayers who itemize deductions may be able to claim a deduction for miles driven in service of a charitable organization. The standard mileage rate for charitable miles as determined by IRS for 2019 and 2020 is 14.00 cents per mile. 

COLLEGE SAVINGS PROGRAMS/PLANS – Connecticut allows a deduction from federal adjusted gross income for contributions made into a CT higher education trust fund (CHET).  New York allows a deduction from federal adjusted gross income for contributions into a New York 529 college savings plan.  The maximum deduction in each state is $5,000 for a single taxpayer and $10,000 for married filing joint.  However, Connecticut allows contributions in excess of these limits to be carried forward for five years; New York does not allow for any carry forward. 

RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CREDIT – The tax credit for making qualified energy improvements to your principal residence, including windows, energy-saving exterior doors, insulation, and certain metal roofs expired in 2016.  Credit for solar electric and solar water heating property expenditures was extended through 2021.  The 30% credit rate is available through 2019 and the credit rate drops to 26% in 2020 and 22% in 2021.

HEALTH CARE REFORM - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) brought a sea of change to our traditional image of health insurance.  Taxpayers and employers will continue to weigh the benefits and costs of obtaining coverage in a public marketplace or a private insurance exchange for themselves and their employees.  Small businesses may be eligible for a tax credit to help pay for health insurance.  Individuals may qualify for a premium assistance tax credit, which is refundable and payable in advance, to offset the cost of coverage. 

Taxpayers began to comply with the tax reporting provisions of ACA in 2014 and employers began complying in 2015.  The reporting level of information continued in 2018.  Individuals reported if they had minimum essential health coverage for all or part of the year, for themselves and their dependents unless exempt.  Taxpayers who were covered for the entire year by health insurance obtained through their workplace will have to check a box to indicate that they had coverage.  Taxpayers will receive Forms 1095-B and/or Form 1095-C from their employers documenting coverage.  The rest of those filing individual tax returns either will have received health coverage through a Health Insurance Marketplace or will not have health insurance coverage.  Those who obtained insurance through the Marketplace will receive Form 1095-A, Health Insurance Marketplace Statement, which will explain their coverage and detail any premium tax credit they received in advance.  Individuals who are not covered by minimum essential coverage and who are not exempt may be liable for an individual shared responsibility payment (also known as a penalty).  For 2019 and 2020, the shared responsibility payment has been eliminated. 

Individuals with flexible spending accounts (FSAs) and similar arrangements should take a look at their annual spending habits and project how they will use these tax favored funds in the future.  The maximum salary reduction contribution to a FSA is $2,700 for 2019 and $2,750 for 2020.  Adjusted for inflation, the annual limitation on deductible contributions to health savings accounts (HSAs) for an individual with self-only coverage under a high deductible health plan (HDHP) is $3,500 for 2019 and $3,550 for 2020; $7,000 for 2019 and $7,100 in 2020 for family coverage. The HSA catch up contributions for age 55 or older is $1,000 for 2018 and 2019 for single and family coverage.

Please note the deadline for employers to issue 1095-B and 1095-C forms for tax year 2019 is March 2, 2020 so these will be arriving late.

GIFT TAXES – Slow and steady estate planning can yield dramatic results - take advantage of the annual gift-giving limits to reduce your income and estate tax liabilities. For 2019 and 2020, the annual exclusion is $15,000 ($30,000 per person for couples.) Remember that if you gift stock, the recipient of the gift takes over the donor’s cost basis and holding period for the security; therefore, the donor needs to provide the recipient with this information.  Effective January 1, 2005, Connecticut laws changed and no gift tax was due by a donor until their cumulative gifts from this date forward added up to $2,000,000; however, a gift tax return has to be filed annually declaring all federal taxable gifts that are made in a tax year.  Due to recent legislation, these exemptions are now $3,600,000 for 2019, $5,100,000 in 2020, $7,100,000 in 2021, $9,100,000 in 2022, and the federal basic exclusion amount for 2023 and thereafter.  Direct payments of educational expenses to a qualified institution for family members, or other beneficiaries, is not treated as a gift for tax purposes and does not count against the annual exclusion amount or the lifetime exemption.

ESTATE TAX REFORM – While TCJA retains the estate tax rate at 40%, for 2019 and 2020 the estate tax exemption moves up $11,400,000 and $11,580,000. TCJA did not repeal the death tax as had been a goal and also did not make the above changes permanent as they expire after 2025. The portability election remains as part of the tax law. Portability allows the second spouse to have the benefit of the deceased spouse’s unused portion of the $11,400,000 exemption even if the second spouse dies when a lower exemption is in effect, possibly after 2025.  No changes were made in TCJA with respect to step up in basis despite the increase in the exemption.

AUTOMATIC REFUND REDUCTIONS - With the number of information sharing acts signed by federal and state taxing authorities as well as other organizations, please be aware that refunds will be automatically reduced for the following matters: delinquent federal taxes, delinquent state taxes, back spousal and/or child support and delinquent non-tax federal debts such as student loans.  If the Department of Treasury’s Financial Management System (FMS), which disburses IRS refunds, offsets the refund for a delinquent amount (correctly or incorrectly), they will send a letter to the taxpayer explaining the reduction and giving the taxpayer the right to challenge the offset.

MAILING & RECORDKEEPING OF TAX PAYMENTS AND TAX RETURNS - When mailing tax returns or payments to federal and state taxing authorities, we advise the use of registered or certified mail to prove timely filing.  We also recommend that you make copies of the checks before mailing for your records.  The IRS has stated that other than direct proof of actual delivery, a mail receipt would be the only evidence of the timely delivery of tax documents.  It is also a good practice to make sure that you have good copies of the front and the back of the check images (where available) once your payments clear the bank in case you have to present this information at a later date.  Please keep in mind that as electronic systems of filing continue to be required, manpower at the federal and state taxing authorities will continue to decline causing longer delays in resolution of matters and placing the burden of proof on the taxpayer.

INCREASED REPORTING PROVISIONS ARE IN EFFECT AIMED AT COMPLIANCE AND REVENUE GENERATION - Banks and other processors of merchant payment cards are required to report a merchant’s annual gross payment card receipts to the IRS along with the merchant’s EIN #.  The law also requires reporting of third-party network transactions such as ones used by online retailers.  Expanded information reporting will continue to assist the IRS in increasing the compliance among merchants.  The IRS plans to compare the merchant’s overall volume of payment card sales in relation to expenses claimed and cash transactions reported, estimating to raise more than $9.5 billion over 10 years as a result of the increased reporting and monitoring.

As of 2013, new rules were fully implemented that required brokers to file information returns that not only provided the IRS and customers with details on the sales proceeds from each trade executed during the year, but also the customer's adjusted basis in the security and whether any gain/loss is short or long term. These information reporting requirements effect business customers as well. Securities subject to the reporting requirements include stocks, bonds, debentures, commodities, derivatives and other financial instruments designated by Treasury.  Brokers notified customers in 2011 regarding elections to make in their accounts concerning the methods to be used for reporting cost basis.  This provision is estimated to raise $6.7 billion over 10 years.

In response to the implementation of broker reporting changes, the IRS introduced Form 8949 Sales and other Dispositions of Capital Assets in 2011.  Form 8949 is used to list all capital gain and loss transactions previously reported on Schedule D of Form 1040.  The subtotals from Form 8949 are then carried over to Schedule D where gain or loss is calculated in the aggregate.  Accurate reporting and matching of data reported by the brokers directly to the IRS as well as the customers is the key focus and purpose of this new form.

Foreign Compliance Activities:  Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) dominated international news beginning in 2014 and still continues today.  Along with FACTA, the U.S. has been expanding its tax treaties and information agreements with foreign jurisdictions to encourage greater transparency.  Since 2014, the IRS provided transition relief with good faith efforts to comply and an offshore voluntary disclosure program (OVDP).  With closure of the OVDP on September 28, 2018, authorities are getting tighter with compliance efforts and the grace periods of transition relief are expected to end.  FinCen Report 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR), reporting for tax year 2019 is due by April 15, 2020 with a 6-month extension available until October 15, 2020.

Identity Theft:  Tax fraud and identity theft have become a growing problem over the years.  Further initiatives continue to be taken by the industry to combat identity theft issues for taxpayers throughout the country.  IRS announced joint efforts have been taken with various state taxing authorities and tax preparation software companies to create a security plan to safeguard taxpayer information.  Tax preparers are required to input the current driver’s license state identification number, issue date and expiration date for ALL taxpayers prior to e-filing without exception.

CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE NEWS –

Connecticut Income Tax Exemption for Teacher Pensions:  The previously authorized 50% income exemption of any taxable pension received from the Connecticut Teacher’s Retirement System is delayed.  The exemption remains at 25% for 2019 and 2020.

Limitation of Property Tax Credit: For 2019, the property tax credit may only be claimed by Connecticut residents who attain the age of 65 before the end of the year or who validly claim one or more dependents on their federal income tax return.  The maximum income tax credit remains at $200.

Exemption of Social Security Benefits from Connecticut Income Tax:  For 2019, adjusted gross income thresholds for determining the amount of Social Security benefits excluded from Connecticut income tax have been increased.

Pension and Annuity Income Modification:  For taxable years beginning January 1, 2019, an individual with the federal filing status of single, married filing separately or head of household with federal adjusted gross income (AGI) of less than $75,000 or married filing jointly with federal AGI of less than $100,000 will be allowed to subtract 14% of any pension or annuity income received when calculating Connecticut AGI.  This applies to the extent that the pension and annuity income has been properly included in federal AGI.

LOOKING AHEAD ……

Even with the significant amount of TCJA guidance issued, the uncertainty and volume of changes in the law have made it difficult for some taxpayers to take full advantage of the opportunities provided by TCJA.  On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law “The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act” and “The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020”.  Here are some of the retirement provisions:

• Allowing employers to include annuities as an investment selection for their employer 401K plans.
• No longer allowing an individual who inherits a pension or IRA from a decedent to “stretch” the required minimum distributions over their lifetime. Instead the withdrawals would have to be withdrawn over a 10-year period.  This would apply to inherited amounts after Dec. 31, 2019.
• For plan years beginning after December 31, 2019, the new law allows the employer who automatically enrolls their workers in certain 401K plans to allow them to raise the employee savings rate to 15% of annual earnings over time. This is an increase in the current rule which was up to 10%.
• Beginning in 2020, taxpayers can contribute to a traditional IRA regardless of age as long as they have adequate compensation. Prior to this new law, you could no longer contribute once reached age 70 ½.
• The bill also increases the required minimum distribution (RMD) age from retirement accounts from 70 ½ to 72. This change is effective for RMDs for individuals who attain age 70 ½ after December 31, 2019.  For those turning age 70 ½ in 2019 or earlier, this new provision would not apply and they must continue to take their annual RMDs under provisions of the old law. 

Other items to highlight from the new legislation: 

• The act extends the treatment of mortgage insurance premium as qualified residence interest through 2020.
• The above the line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses for higher education is extended through 2020.
• Non business energy property credit for windows, doors, skylights and roofs allows a credit of 10%. The credit can be used through the end of 2020.
• The refundable credit for health insurance costs of eligible individuals is extended through 2020.
• Penalty free withdrawals up to $5,000 per taxpayer from retirement plans beginning January 1, 2020 if made during the one year period beginning on the date on which a child is born or legal adoption is finalized.
• 529 distributions made after December 31, 2018 are expanded to cover costs associated with registered apprenticeships and up to $10,000 of qualified student loan repayments of principal and interest of the beneficiary.
• All ACA taxes are repealed. This includes the medical device excise tax, health insurance provider’s fee and high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage tax (Cadillac plans).  This does not repeal the 3.8% tax Obama put on investment income.

Kiddie tax is reinstated and the unearned income of children is taxed at the top marginal rate of their parents.  This change is effective for tax years beginning in 2020; however, you can elect to apply this change to 2018 or 2019 (or both).

When you make retail purchases of goods or services in your resident state, you usually pay sales tax to the seller if the sale of such goods or services is subject to sales tax according to the law of your resident state.  The seller in turn remits the sales tax collected to the state taxing authority.  In general, when these same types of goods or services are purchased outside of your resident state, they are subject to "use tax" when the goods are brought into your resident state.

When you make retail purchases of goods or services in your resident state, you usually pay sales tax to the seller if the sale of such goods or services is subject to sales tax according to the law of your resident state.  The seller in turn remits the sales tax collected to the state taxing authority.  In general, when these same types of goods or services are purchased outside of your resident state, they are subject to "use tax" when the goods are brought into your resident state.

Today, with the increase in catalog and online shopping, many taxpayers are buying items out of state that would be subject to tax if they were purchased in their resident state.  The state tax authorities, especially Connecticut and New York, are actively pursuing the collection of this use tax in order to meet budgetary constraints.  In fact, the states, along with the Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Customs, have signed information sharing agreements to help each other collect all outstanding tax money.  Working together, the authorities have many resources available to gather their information.

Keep in mind that the taxing authorities are specifically targeting the purchase of items such as automobiles (and parts), appliances, furniture, jewelry, cameras, computers, electronics, cigarettes and other tobacco products, alcohol, boats, art and antiques.  However, they are also seeking out those taxpayers who are steady catalog and online shoppers not paying sales tax. 

The individual use tax is declared and paid when you file your resident state individual income tax return. 

If all the goods purchased and brought into Connecticut at one time total $25 or less, you do not have to pay Connecticut use tax.  The $25 exemption does not apply to goods shipped or mailed to you.  Connecticut requires that taxpayers separately list any individual item with a purchase price of $300 or more.  When listing this information, you must provide the date of purchase, a description of goods or service, the retailer or service provider and the purchase price.  Items with an individual purchase price under $300 do not have to be listed separately; instead the total combined purchases must be given to calculate the use tax due.

The general Connecticut sales and use tax rate for 2019 was 6.35%; however, there are categories with different tax rates from the general rates.  There are too many categories to list for the purposes of this letter; however, there are a few that need to be highlighted.  Specifically a use tax rate of 7.75% applies to the following: the sale of most motor vehicles exceeding $50,000, the sale of each piece of jewelry exceeding $5,000, the sale of each piece of clothing or pair of footwear exceeding $1,000 and a handbag, luggage, umbrella, wallet or watch exceeding $1,000.

New York provides two options for calculating the use tax due on purchases of less than $1,000 (excluding shipping and handling) each that are not related to a business, rental real estate or royalty activities - the exact calculation method or the sales and use tax chart.  For the exact calculation method, the taxpayer must provide the purchase price, purchase date and jurisdiction of purchase.  The sales and use tax chart is a simple, time-saving method whereby the taxpayer pays use tax based on their federal adjusted gross income according to the chart established by the state.  The exact calculation method must be used on each purchase of $1,000 or more.  For individual items subject to use tax greater than $25,000, the following information must be provided: date item was purchased, description of item purchased, seller’s name and address, delivery address/address of use and purchase price.

Failure to pay use tax may result in the imposition of penalties and interest.  The states are requiring taxpayers to declare an obligation for use tax on their individual income tax returns.  Zero is a valid declaration if you do not have a liability.  If you do not make an entry on the individual use tax line of your resident tax return, you are considered to not have filed a use tax return.

Therefore, when providing your information for payment of use tax, please be sure to specify the following complete information:

• Details of purchase information as specified by the state thresholds for reporting individual purchases
• Details of purchase information as specified by the special categories in Connecticut

Internal Revenue Service regulations along with the tax authorities of Connecticut and New York mandate that tax preparers electronically file individual, fiduciary and business income   tax returns.  We believe that trends will continue with authorities requiring the electronic filing of more information, tax returns and tax payments.  Therefore, all 2019 income tax returns filed federally and in the States of Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts are required to be filed using the Federal & State Electronic Filing Program (E-File).  The firm will voluntarily file individual returns electronically in the States of California and New Jersey.  We also reserve the right to electronically file in additional states as deemed appropriate and will encourage this method of filing. 

Internal Revenue Service regulations along with the tax authorities of Connecticut and New York mandate that tax preparers electronically file individual, fiduciary and business income   tax returns.  We believe that trends will continue with authorities requiring the electronic filing of more information, tax returns and tax payments.  Therefore, all 2019 income tax returns filed federally and in the States of Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts are required to be filed using the Federal & State Electronic Filing Program (E-File).  The firm will voluntarily file individual returns electronically in the States of California and New Jersey.  We also reserve the right to electronically file in additional states as deemed appropriate and will encourage this method of filing. 

Our firm has informed you of the regulations and mandates for electronic filing.  However, the decision as to whether your income tax returns will be electronically filed or not rests with you, the taxpayer.  If you choose not to file electronically, we will inform you of the necessary procedures that need to be followed for opting out.

Electronic filing offers the following benefits:

1. Allows the Revenue Departments to process returns quickly and accurately, saving tax dollars.
2. Taxpayers who have a return with a balance due can file their return early and choose to make payment anytime on or before April 15, 2020.
3. Taxpayers who file returns with refunds receive those refunds faster especially if the refund is directly deposited into their bank account.
4. Electronically filed returns receive an acknowledgment of receipt from the Internal Revenue Service and the applicable State Tax Authority and are verified to be mathematically correct, eliminating data entry errors and lost or misplaced mail.

If we did not prepare your returns for 2018, we will need copies of your driver’s licenses and social security cards or passports. 

How does this affect the process of preparing your 2019 income tax returns?

The actual preparation process of your return does not change.  However, the administration, review process and completion of the returns will be effected.  The following is an overview of how the electronic filing process will work.

1) Taxpayers should forward complete information for the preparation of their 2019 income tax returns including all supporting documentation.  Regulations for electronic filing require that our firm maintain copies of the social security cards and driver's licenses for yourself, your spouse and all dependents claimed on the 2019 tax return.  NOTE:  If you provided this information to us last year regarding the preparation of your 2018 tax return, you do not have to provide it again.  However, the driver’s license and passports on file must be current.  Please call our office to verify your information on file if you have any questions.

2) Electronic filing provides various methods for payment and receipt of your refunds.  Payments can be made by 1) paper check, 2) credit card (a convenience fee will be charged by the processing company used by tax authorities) and 3) direct debit out of a designated account.  Refunds can be issued by 1) paper check, 2) application of all or a portion to the 2020 tax year and 3) direct deposit into designated account(s) – see NOTE below.  Returns filed electronically can be filed early but payment not made until a later date designated by you whether payment is by check, credit card or direct debit.  Please complete the enclosed Organizer Form 4A (Direct Deposit and Withdrawal) to indicate to us how you would like to handle payments and/or refunds and return it with the information to prepare your tax return.  If you desire to use direct deposit or direct debit, please enclose a voided check so we have complete account information and the financial institution routing transit number.  It is the taxpayer’s responsibility to provide proper banking information and to verify that the payments have been withdrawn from the designated account.  Please allow enough time when scheduling payments to be made directly from accounts.  If problems with payment by direct debit are encountered, taxpayers need to have enough time available for a paper check to be submitted on a timely basis.

NOTE:  Generally, if you do not elect direct deposit, the State of Connecticut will issue refunds by paper check; however, they are encouraging direct deposit.  Direct deposit will NOT be available for first time Connecticut filers.  The State of New York is offering the option for receipt of refunds by direct deposit or paper check.  IRS is offering refunds by paper check or direct deposit. 

WARNING: It is suggested that refunds on joint tax returns should only be directly deposited into joint bank accounts.  The federal banking regulations, as applied by each bank, may not accept a joint refund into an individual account; our firm has no knowledge of how your bank will handle this matter.  Also, be aware that refunds will be retained, not issued or decreased for any of the following: 1) delinquent federal taxes, 2) delinquent state taxes, 3) delinquent student loans, 4) delinquent spousal and/or child support, 5) delinquent state unemployment compensation debts and 6) debts owed to other state and/or federal agencies.

3) Once your return has been prepared, our firm will forward a "Review Copy" to you.  This review copy can be sent electronically using access through a portal system for your protection or by hard copy (either mail or you can pick it up at our office).  Please let us know the delivery method for the "Review Copy" on the bottom of the enclosed engagement letter which should be submitted with your tax information.

4) If you review the return and are in agreement with the return as prepared, the taxpayer(s) will need to sign Form 8879, IRS e-file Signature Authorization, Form TR-579-IT New York State e-file Signature Authorization, Form FTB 8879 California e-file Signature Authorization, Form M-8453, Massachusetts e-file Signature Authorization, as applicable, and any additional efile form(s) as necessary and included in your "Review Copy" package.  Connecticut and New Jersey accept the federal signature on Form 8879.  Tax returns cannot be filed electronically until our firm is in receipt of the signature authorization forms signed by the taxpayer(s). 

5)  If you review the return and are NOT in agreement with the return as prepared, please call our office to discuss the questions/issues.  If necessary, a new "Review Copy" and signature authorization forms will be prepared.  Please remember that the only way electronically filed tax returns can be changed is by amending the returns.  Therefore, it is imperative that you are in complete agreement with the returns before returning the signature authorization forms to us. 

6) Once we receive your completed signature authorization forms, our firm will electronically submit your Federal, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and/or California income tax returns.  Income tax returns for all other states will be filed on paper at this time unless we deem it appropriate to electronically file in the other state(s).  Once we receive acknowledgement that your electronically filed returns have been accepted by the taxing authorities, we will forward a complete package to you which will include the following documents: 1) your original information if it has not already been returned with your review copy, 2) 2019 payment vouchers to taxing authorities, if necessary, 3) 2019 income tax returns for other states to be filed by paper, if necessary, 4) 2020 estimated tax payments, if necessary, 5) a copy of the 2019 individual return electronic transmission history and acceptance notification, and 6) a final signed copy of your electronically filed 2019 Federal and state income tax returns, if requested.  Please include on the bottom of the enclosed engagement letter how you would like to receive this complete package.

Some extensions for filing 2019 tax returns must be filed electronically as paper is no longer an acceptable filing method.  Therefore, taxpayers must allow enough time for completing this process.  Please contact our office by Friday, March 23, 2020 if you will need to file extensions for the 2019 tax year.

We ask for your continued cooperation in implementing these income tax return preparation and filing requirements.  If you have any questions, please give us a call.

On July 4, President Donald Trump signed into law a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) application extension bill that Congress had quickly passed just before the Independence Day holiday. According to several senators, the measure was "surprisingly" introduced and approved by unanimous consent in the Senate late on June 30. It cleared the House the evening of July 1.

On July 4, President Donald Trump signed into law a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) application extension bill that Congress had quickly passed just before the Independence Day holiday. According to several senators, the measure was "surprisingly" introduced and approved by unanimous consent in the Senate late on June 30. It cleared the House the evening of July 1.

Most notably, the bill pushes out the PPP application window deadline five weeks from June 30 to August 8. "The resources are there. The need is there. We just need to change the date," Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., said. Prior to the extension, the small business loan program was set to expire at midnight on July 1 with over $130 billion left in funding.

Mnuchin, Rettig Testify
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and IRS Commissioner Charles "Chuck" Rettig testified before House and Senate committees on June 30, just hours before the PPP application period was set to close.

"There appears to be bipartisan support to repurpose the [remaining] $134 billion for PPP," Mnuchin told lawmakers during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on June 30. Mnuchin stated that "it should be done," and that the administration is looking toward targeted industry-specific relief.

Additionally, Mnuchin told lawmakers that he has been having discussions about more PPP-related relief with the House and Senate Small Business Committees. Reportedly, lawmakers are currently considering an extension or a second round of the PPP.

As for "phase four" of Congress’s next economic relief package, Mnuchin again alluded to a narrower approach. "We would anticipate that any additional relief would be targeted to certain industries that have been especially hard-hit by the pandemic, with a focus on jobs and putting all American workers who lost their jobs, through no fault of their own, back to work."

Meanwhile, several PPP-related bills have been introduced in the Senate over the last few weeks, and most recently a bipartisan PPP Forgiveness bill introduced on June 30. The Paycheck Protection Small Business Forgiveness Bill, authored by bipartisan members of the Senate Banking Committee, would streamline the forgiveness of certain PPP loans.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, also called for an extension of the small business loan program. "It is the last day small business can apply for PPP, but the economic crisis is not over. Senators Cardin, Shaheen, Coons and I will take to the Senate floor and demand we pass a bill to extend it," Schumer said in a June 30 tweet.

IRS 2020 Filing Season, Agency Redesign
In other news, Rettig testified on June 30 before the Senate Finance Committee (SFC) on IRS operations during the 2020 tax filing season. Notably, Rettig told senators that the decision not to further extend the 2019 tax year filing and payment deadline beyond July 15 was made in consultation with professional services organizations, adding that too many due dates can be confusing for taxpayers.

To that end, Treasury first signaled in a June 29 press release that it would not further extend the 2020 filing season. "Treasury and IRS encourage taxpayers to file their taxes by July 15, or file for an automatic extension of time to file to October 15," the press release stated.

"The IRS understands that those affected by the coronavirus may not be able to pay their balances in full by July 15, but we have many payment options to help taxpayers," Rettig said in the press release. "These easy-to-use payment options are available on IRS.gov, and most can be done automatically without reaching out to an IRS representative."

Additionally, Rettig told SFC members that the IRS is well underway in its redesign of the agency for the first time in over 20 years. As noted in Rettig’s testimony, the foundational components of a new holistic taxpayer experience will include the following:

• Expanded Digital Services. An improved experience through self-service digital channels by building upon existing online accounts and introducing online accounts for tax professionals and business taxpayers.
• Seamless Experience. Taxpayers should be guided to the resources and communication channels that will resolve their issues most effectively and efficiently.
• Proactive Outreach and Education. Educate the taxpayer community by proactively providing information in the language, timing, and method taxpayers need or prefer.
• Focused Strategies for Reaching Underserved Communities. Establish a consolidated program to engage with historically underserved communities to address issues of communication, education, transparency and trust, as well as access to quality products and services.
• Ecosystem of Partnerships. Establish, shepherd, and facilitate a collaborative and interactive network of partnerships across the entire tax ecosystem and bring together existing efforts.
• Enterprise Data Management and Advanced Analytics. An enterprise data management strategy that includes a cross-enterprise understanding of the customer experience, emerging needs and expectations, and operational data.

"If you can look into the seeds of time, and say which grain will grow and which will not, speak then unto me." — William Shakespeare

"If you can look into the seeds of time, and say which grain will grow and which will not, speak then unto me." — William Shakespeare

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was enacted under the bipartisan Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act ( P.L. 116-136) on March 27, 2020. The PPP, a seemingly ever-evolving small business loan program, was derived from an unprecedented partnership between certain private lending institutions and the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA). After its enactment in late March, the program quickly went from concept to implementation when it launched on April 3, 2020.

Fast forward to a somewhat rocky roll-out with several speed bumps and shake-ups, akin to a Shakespearean plotline, President Donald Trump on June 5, 2020, signed into law the bipartisan Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (PPPFA) of 2020 ( P.L. 116-142). The PPPFA makes several enhancements to the swiftly implemented loan program, including providing for an extension of the expense forgiveness period from 8-to-24 weeks. The legislation also reduces the 75 percent payroll ratio requirement to 60 percent, extends the two-year loan repayment requirement to five years for future borrowers (existing PPP loans can be extended up to five years if lender/borrower agree), allows payroll tax deferment for PPP recipients, and extends the June 30, 2020, rehiring deadline to December 31, 2020.

Accordingly, the SBA, in consultation with Treasury, officially published in the Federal Register updated interim final rules (effective immediately upon publication, as opposed to the "regular order" of first issuing a proposed rule with a preliminary comment period) on June 16 and June 18, and issued new and revised forgiveness applications forms on June 17. Additional guidance is expected. The SBA is accepting comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov.

Wolters Kluwer recently spoke with Daniel G. Strickland, an associate with Eversheds Sutherland, about some of the underlying tax policy issues and lingering complexities with the PPP, and subsequent legislation and guidance. Strickland, who regularly works with the IRS on behalf of taxpayers to obtain benefits offered by the IRS, and with taxpayers to resolve tax controversy disputes with the IRS, currently serves as co-chair of the Federal Bar Association’s Tax Practice and Procedure Committee, as well as chair of the D.C. Bar Association’s New Tax Practitioner Subcommittee. Prior to tax practice, Strickland clerked for several years at the U.S. Tax Court.

To Double-Dip, or not to Double-Dip: That is the Question…(Well, One of Them)
Wolters Kluwer: Can you expand upon the preventive double-benefit tax policy position behind the IRS’s controversial Notice 2020-32, I.R.B. 2020-21, 837, which states that business expenses paid with tax-exempt income, i.e. a forgivable PPP loan, are not deductible under Code Sec. 265? Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said recently, "if the money that is coming is not taxable, you can't double dip."

Daniel Strickland: Good question. As you correctly state, the IRS published Notice 2020-32 to address the tax treatment of expenses that would otherwise be deductible but that were paid using PPP loan proceeds that are forgiven.

From the IRS’s perspective, Congress only exempted the amount of forgiveness from taxation; it did not allow deductions for the expenses paid with forgiven proceeds. Notice 2020-32 points to section 265 as providing legal support for the proposition that otherwise-deductible expenses are not allowable for deduction to the extent that the income is wholly exempt from taxation.

My take is that the IRS is drawing a line at government-sponsored business expenses. In other words, for the taxpayers to receive forgiveness, the loan proceeds must be spent in a certain way. If they are, then it is as if the government paid those expenses directly in a valiant effort to prop up the COVID-affected small businesses. But there is an issue with the IRS’s position: a borrower cannot know the extent to which it will even be eligible for forgiveness—let alone whether its substantiation will be sufficient. And given the deadline for application for forgiveness, borrowers might not even know in the same tax year.

Wolters Kluwer: Sen. John Cornyn, R-Tex., recently introduced the bipartisan Small Business Expense Protection Act ( S. 3612), which moves to essentially nullify Notice 2020-32, clarifying congressional intent that the receipt and forgiveness of a PPP loan would not affect the deductibility of ordinary business expenses. What is your take on the underlying policy of this bill, and do you see the IRS reversing Notice 2020-32 before the measure moves through Congress?

Daniel Strickland: Senator Cornyn has the right idea. In my mind, a few simple examples show the logic: If I borrowed money from a bank and spent the proceeds on deductible expenses, I could deduct those expenses from my income when I file my taxes. If the bank forgave my debt, I would need to recognize the forgiven amount as income. If, on the other hand, I received a gift, I could also use that gift to pay for deductible expenses and then deduct those expenses from my income. I would not generally include the gift in my income – setting aside the differences between corporate taxes and individual taxes—since many small businesses are sole proprietorships or disregarded entities. When the CARES Act provided that the forgiven PPP loan amounts were not subject to tax, conceptually, the loans are turned into gifts. The deductibility should be no different. And the tax treatment should be the same irrespective of the type of corporate entity involved.

That is where the Senator is coming from. Unfortunately, the existence of a bill in Congress isn’t going to be enough to convince the IRS to about-face. The fact that there are still holds on Senator Cornyn’s bill is concerning to me.

"Know You of This Taxation?"
Wolters Kluwer: Are there other tax-related implications taxpayers and practitioners should keep in mind specific to PPP loan forgiveness?

Daniel Strickland: There are always tax implications. In the absence of congressional action on the deductibility question, another arises regarding timing. As detailed in the SBA’s interim final rule, SBA-2020-0035:

If you do not submit to your lender a loan forgiveness application within 10 months after the end of your loan forgiveness covered period, you must begin paying principal and interest after that period. For example, if a borrower’s PPP loan is disbursed on June 25, 2020, the 24-week period ends on December 10, 2020. If the borrower does not submit a loan forgiveness application to its lender by October 10, 2021, the borrower must begin making payments on or after October 10, 2021.

Taxpayers may not know whether—or to what extent—their PPP loans are forgiven until 2021, and some may not know until after they file their 2020 income tax returns. How should the deductions be reported?

In addition, we don’t know how the state and local taxing authorities will react.

Wolters Kluwer: Although the SBA, in consultation with Treasury, has addressed the PPPFA’s 60 percent "cliff" to allow for partial forgiveness if the 60 percent threshold is not reached, an added variable to the equation now exists. According to a June 8 joint Treasury/SBA statement and now updated guidance, partial forgiveness will be subject to at least 60 percent of the loan forgiveness amount having been used for payroll costs. What is your interpretation of this new variable, and is the solution to the 60 percent "cliff," as termed by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Me., who was recently drafting a bill to address the issue, correctly addressed through regulatory guidance? Do you foresee any pushback?

Daniel Strickland: If I am honest, this one took me a couple times to read to understand that it isn’t internally inconsistent:

If a borrower uses less than 60 percent of the loan amount for payroll costs during the forgiveness covered period, the borrower will continue to be eligible for partial loan forgiveness, subject to at least 60 percent of the loan forgiveness amount having been used for payroll costs.

I certainly understand what the SBA is trying to do here, but I think the better explanation is in the SBA’s updated interim final rule, Docket No. SBA-2020-0035. The SBA does a great job explaining the math behind the partial forgiveness.

But to your question, I am not sure that this falls within the realm of regulatory guidance. The hurdle is going to be with the language of the PPPFA:

LIMITATION ON FORGIVENESS.—To receive loan forgiveness under this section, an eligible recipient shall use at least 60 percent of the covered loan amount for payroll costs, and may use up to 40 percent of such amount for any payment of interest on any covered mortgage obligation (which shall not include any prepayment of or payment of principal on a covered mortgage obligation), any payment on any covered rent obligation, or any covered utility payment.

That being said, the SBA is creating a taxpayer-favorable solution to the PPPFA’s 60 percent "cliff." I am not sure who in their right mind will object, but given the pressure put onto the SBA’s rules in courts across the country, it will be interesting to see what happens next and how the agencies show reasoned decision-making in their rules that diverge from the statutory text.

"All’s Well That Ends Well?"
Wolters Kluwer: The PPP application process is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2020. Notably, prior to Senate approval of the PPPFA, the congressional record was updated with a letter from the bipartisan, bicameral PPPFA authors and policy architects to state that the PPPFA’s "extension of the covered period does not authorize the [SBA] to issue any new PPP loans after June 30, 2020, as this date remains fixed by section 1102(b) of the CARES Act." Furthermore, Treasury and the SBA, too, recently reaffirmed the June 30 cutoff date.

However, Mnuchin told lawmakers recently that another round of loans is on the discussion table, following Sen. Tim Scott’s, R-S.C., inquiry as to whether there is an appetite for further enhancing and extending the PPP. Moreover, fellow Senate Small Business Committee members Chris Coons, D-Del., and Ben Cardin, D-Md., have introduced the Prioritized Paycheck Protection Program (P4) Bill, which would authorize new lending under the PPP to borrowers with 100 employees or less who have or will soon exhaust the original PPP loan. A Democratic companion bill was introduced in the House on June 18.

Are you aware of any calls among taxpayers or practitioners to extend PPP loan applications beyond June?

Daniel Strickland: The SBA has been processing loans fast, processing more than 14 years’ worth of loans in 14 days in the initial round of funding. Since then, however, things have slowed down. I haven’t heard any calls for extension recently. But at the same time, the most recent numbers I saw suggested that there is still more than $125 billion available. The next round of published data will give us some indication of what happens. If there is still a significant amount of money left over, and if there is a need, I can certainly see Congress extending the loan application deadline without expanding the available funds. It would be additional taxpayer relief at no additional cost to the government. But with the PPPFA’s changes, we might see the remaining funds mostly or completely extended. In that case, I think we wouldn’t see an extension without another tranche of available funding.

"Confusion Now Hath Made His Masterpiece"
Wolters Kluwer: As for when pension expenses are paid and incurred, current guidance does not indicate whether the amount that is "paid by Borrower" can include retirement contributions attributable to all of 2019, 2020, or even the two years combined. Absent any further guidance, how would you advise taxpayers and practitioners on the matter?

Daniel Strickland: That is a tough question. The short answer is that there are a lot of unanswered questions like this one. The SBA and IRS are publishing guidance as quickly as they can, but it isn’t possible to give the requisite considered decision-making and answer all of the outstanding questions at the same time. What that means for taxpayers and practitioners is that each situation needs to be carefully considered. Without specific guidance, there is a risk that certain expenses don’t qualify for forgiveness or that a portion of the loan could be called for repayment.

The first thing that I advise is to work with an attorney to evaluate the specific facts of each situation and to look at the tax and business consequences of each option. In general, where there is no clear answer, having advice in writing from your attorney that the answer you choose is the right answer can help protect businesses from some of the negative consequences of being wrong.

Wolters Kluwer: Outside the most recently published interim final rules, are there other unanswered questions for which you think Treasury and the SBA could issue additional PPP guidance?

Daniel Strickland: There are a number of unanswered questions with respect to definitions. As you reference above, the one that makes most practitioners’ lists is this issue of paid versus incurred. The loan amount is determined using "monthly payments by the applicant for payroll costs incurred." And forgiveness is determined based on "the sum of the following costs incurred and payments made during the covered period." Another outstanding question is how the forgiveness reduction exemptions will work with the cure date being shifted to December 31 and how the "option to use an eight-week covered period" for those taxpayers who have already received their loan proceeds will work if the June 30 cure date falls within the 8-week covered period.

These are just the tip of the iceberg of unanswered questions.

Wolters Kluwer: Executive agencies, including the IRS and SBA, have been increasingly reliant on sub-regulatory FAQs as a means for issuing guidance lately. What are some potential consequences or drawbacks to this method?

Daniel Strickland: Receiving guidance by FAQ is certainly an efficient way to push information out to taxpayers and practitioners. But as you allude, there are some potential issues—both legal and practical. The first for me is in the second introductory paragraph:

Borrowers and lenders may rely on the guidance provided in this document as SBA’s interpretation of the Paycheck Protection Program Interim Final Rules . . . . The U.S. government will not challenge lender PPP actions that conform to this guidance 1[.]

Footnote 1 provides:

This document does not carry the force and effect of law independent of the statute and regulations on which it is based.

Although "borrowers . . . may rely on the guidance," it is only the SBA’s interpretation of its own interim final rules. There is certainly an open question as to the level of deference to which the FAQs are entitled.

Second to that is the issue of whether the government will challenge taxpayer actions that conform to the guidance. Although the guidance provides some comfort to lenders, and the lenders will be the ones approving loan forgiveness applications, there are still a slew of potential consequences in the fine print that could be asserted against borrowers.

Third is the complexity in advising clients. If you are paying daily attention to the guidance, the tempo of guidance isn’t a big deal, but what I am noticing is that the guidance is changing—think about the initial PPP interest rate of 0.50 percent fixed rate announced by Treasury that was later changed to 1.00 percent fixed rate—and few of the published thought guidance pieces are being updated. For practitioners who are trying to play catchup after receiving a client question, this can be complicated and a great deal of time can be lost spinning their wheels trying to figure out why two seemingly well-reasoned articles have divergent facts or conclusions.

Last, but not least, for taxpayers who are looking for answers online, this could be devastating when it comes to applications for forgiveness. If practitioners are having to sift through the outdated legal analysis by comparison to the newest FAQ iteration, how can taxpayers be confident that they are only relying on the correct version. And when the next round of guidance comes out, those taxpayers must rinse and repeat.

"Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow…"
Wolters Kluwer: Looking ahead, any closing thoughts or advice for practitioners related to the PPP moving forward?

Daniel Strickland: We all want to get to the right answer. For taxpayers and practitioners alike, it is important to ask questions. The SBA, for example, is receptive to discussing concerns and comments. And given the frequency of guidance, it is more important than ever to be involved in the process. For taxpayers specifically, asking questions of their advisers can protect small businesses against the "penny-wise, pound-foolish" adage. I know I want to protect my clients from missteps and help them take fullest advantage of these benefits.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Trump Administration’s rule under the Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) that any nongovernment, nonpublicly traded employer can refuse to offer contraceptive coverage for moral or religious reasons, and that publicly traded employers can refuse to do so for religious reasons. Application of this rule had been halted by litigation, but the Administration is now free to apply it.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Trump Administration’s rule under the Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) that any nongovernment, nonpublicly traded employer can refuse to offer contraceptive coverage for moral or religious reasons, and that publicly traded employers can refuse to do so for religious reasons. Application of this rule had been halted by litigation, but the Administration is now free to apply it.

The issues in the case were: (1) whether the ACA actually requires contraceptive coverage or was that just a creature of regulations that any administration may change, and (2) whether the administration complied with Administrative Procedures Act (APA) in light of the surprising breadth of the regulation going well beyond religious objections to include any moral objection.

Contraceptive Regulation
The prior version of this regulation included an exception for religious employers and small businesses with a religious objection. They had to self-certify that they qualified. Some objected. Shortly after the Administration changed hands, it issued a new version as an interim final regulation.

The Treasury, Health and Human Services (HHS), and Labor Departments have nearly identical versions of these rules. The Treasury version is Reg. §54.9815-2713(a)(1)(iv), but it references HHS regulations (45 CFR 147.131–147.133), and that is where much of the change was made.

The new rule provides that a nongovernment employer that has religious or moral objections to providing coverage for some or all forms of birth control can simply not provide the coverage. These rules also apply to colleges and universities providing student health insurance coverage. The religious exemption is open to any nongovernment employer, including both nonprofit and for-profit entities. The same holds true for the moral exemption, except only the religious exemption is available for publicly traded employers. An objecting employer need not file anything with the government, though affected plan participants need to be notified of mid-plan year coverage changes. Employers are free to pick and choose among contraceptives if they do decide to offer contraceptive coverage.

These regulations extend the exemption for objecting employers to objecting health insurance issuers, and to objecting individuals under which a health insurance issuer may offer a separate benefit package option to any individual who objects to coverage or payments for some or all contraceptive services based on the individual’s sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions.

Authority Under ACA
The majority opinion by Justice Thomas viewed the ACA as blank slate on what it required for women’s preventive health. The relevant ACA provision provides that, with respect to women, a group health plan and a health insurance issuer shall, at a minimum provide additional preventive care and screenings "as provided for" in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). At the time of the ACA’s enactment, these guidelines were not yet written.

The HRSA Guidelines were based on recommendations compiled by the Institute of Medicine (now called the National Academy of Medicine). The Guidelines included the contraceptive mandate, which required health plans to provide coverage for all contraceptive methods and sterilization procedures approved by the Food and Drug Administration, as well as related education and counseling.

The same day the Guidelines were issued in 2011, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury (the Departments) issued interim final regulations requiring contraceptive coverage, with exceptions for churches. The Departments determined that it was appropriate that HRSA take into account the mandate’s effect on certain religious employers, and concluded that HRSA had the discretion to do so through the creation of an exemption. Ever since, the HRSA has been tasked (according to the majority opinion) with devising religious exemptions. The majority opinion concluded that ACA granted the HRSA broad authority to define preventive care and screenings, which implies that the HRSA also has broad power to create any religious and moral exemptions. Thus, if the HRSA changes its mind, there is nothing in the ACA to prevent it.

Justice Ginsburg’s dissent (joined by Justice Sotomayor) argued the legislative language HRSA in fact only delegates to the HRSA the task of compiling a list of services that should be provided. The ACA did not delegate the authority to determine who must provide the coverage for these services. Justice Kagan’s concurrence (joined by Justice Breyer) disagreed with the majority and dissent about the clarity of the ACA’s language on this, but from the beginning the Departments acted as if it were up to the HRSA to make this call. Under the Chevron doctrine, the interpretation of unclear legislation by the agency tasked with enforcement is owed due deference by the courts.

No “Open-Mindedness” Test
The majority opinion found no violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. The fact that the final rules made only minor alterations to the interim final regulations did not render the final rules procedurally invalid, because nothing in the record suggested that the Departments maintained an open mind during the post-promulgation process. The “open-mindedness” test has no basis in the APA, according to Justice Thomas.

The majority opinion also addressed the issue of calling the document containing the interim final rules "Interim Final Rules with Request for Comments" instead of "General Notice of Proposed Rulemaking." The request for comments readily satisfied the APA notice requirements, Justice Thomas ruled. Even assuming that the APA requires an agency to publish a document entitled "notice of proposed rulemaking," there was no prejudicial error here.

Justice Kagan’s opinion questioned whether the rule was not arbitrary and capricious. The rule went beyond what the Departments’ justification supported, raising doubts about whether the solution lacks a "rational connection" to the problem described. Few employers have expressed reservations about self-certification, and in any case the new exemption includes any employer (except publicly traded employers) with a moral objection whether it is religious or not.

Where’s RFRA?
The majority opinion stopped its authority analysis at holding that the ACA authorized the regulation, and stated that it did not need go into the requirements of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). Justice Alito (joined by Justice Gorsuch) filed a concurrence taking the position that RFRA compels an exemption for the Little Sisters and any other employer with a similar objection to what has been called the accommodation to the contraceptive mandate.

The IRS has issued guidance to employers on the requirement to report the amount of qualified sick and family leave wages paid to employees under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (Families First Act) ( P.L. 116-127). This reporting provides employees who are also self-employed with information necessary for properly claiming qualified sick leave equivalent or qualified family leave equivalent credits under the Families First Act.

The IRS has issued guidance to employers on the requirement to report the amount of qualified sick and family leave wages paid to employees under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (Families First Act) ( P.L. 116-127). This reporting provides employees who are also self-employed with information necessary for properly claiming qualified sick leave equivalent or qualified family leave equivalent credits under the Families First Act.

Background
Under the Families First Act, many employers with fewer than 500 employees must provide paid leave to employees due to circumstances related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Certain employers must provide an employee with up to 80 hours of paid sick leave if the employee cannot work or telework because he or she:

1. is subject to a federal, state or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19;
2. has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19;
3. is experiencing symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking a medical diagnosis;
4. is caring for an individual who is subject to a federal, state, or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19, or has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19;
5. is caring for a son or daughter if the child’s school or place of care has been closed, or the child’s care provider is unavailable, due to COVID-19 precautions; or
6. is experiencing any other substantially similar condition specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in consultation with the Secretaries of the Treasury and Labor.

The employee is entitled to paid sick leave at his or her regular pay rate (or if higher, the applicable federal, state, or local minimum wage), up to:

• $511 per day ($5,110 in the aggregate) if the employee cannot work for reasons listed in (1), (2), or (3), above;
• $200 per day ($2,000 in the aggregate) if the employee cannot work for reasons listed in (4), (5), or (6) above.

The Families First Act also amends the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to require employers to provide expanded paid family and medical leave to employees who cannot work or telework for reasons related to COVID-19. An employee can receive up to 10 weeks of paid family and medical leave at two-thirds the employee’s regular rate of pay, up to $200 per day ($10,000 in the aggregate) if the employee cannot work because he or she is caring for a son or daughter whose school or place of care is closed, or whose child care provider is unavailable, for reasons related to COVID-19.

Eligible employers may receive a refundable payroll credit for required qualified sick leave wages or qualified family leave wages paid to an employee, plus allocable qualified health plan expenses. An equivalent credit is available to self-employed individuals carrying on a trade or business, if the self-employed individual would be entitled to receive paid leave if he or she were an employee of an employer (other than himself or herself). The refundable credits apply to qualified leave wages paid with respect to the period beginning on April 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2020.

Reporting Qualified Leave Wages
In addition to reporting qualified sick leave wages paid and qualified family leave wages paid in Boxes 1, 3 (up to the social security wage base), and 5 of Form W-2 (or, in the case of compensation subject to the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA), in Boxes 1 and 14 of Form W-2), employers must report to the employee the following types and amounts of the wages that were paid, with each amount separately reported either in Box 14 of Form W-2 or on a separate statement:

• the total amount of qualified sick leave wages paid for reasons (1), (2), or (3) above, labelled as "sick leave wages subject to the $511 per day limit" or in similar language;
• the total amount of qualified sick leave wages paid for reasons (4), (5), or (6) above, labelled as "sick leave wages subject to the $200 per day limit" or in similar language; and
• the total amount of qualified family leave wages paid, labelled as "emergency family leave wages" or in similar language.

If a separate statement is provided and the employee receives a paper Form W-2, the statement must be included with the Form W-2 provided to the employee. If the employee receives an electronic Form W-2, the statement must be provided in the same manner and at the same time as the Form W-2.

Self-Employed Individuals
Self-employed individuals who are claiming qualified sick leave equivalent or qualified family leave equivalent credits, and who are also eligible for qualified sick leave and qualified family leave wages as employees, must report the qualified leave wage amounts described above on Form 7202, Credits for Sick Leave and Family Leave for Certain Self-Employed Individuals, included with their income tax returns. They also must reduce (but not below zero) any qualified sick leave or qualified family leave equivalent credits by the amount of these qualified leave wages.

The IRS has issued guidance and temporary relief for required minimum distribution (RMD) changes in 2020. Distributions that would have been RMDs under old law are treated as eligible rollover distributions. The 60-day rollover period deadline for any 2020 RMDs already taken has been extended to August 31, 2020. Notice 2007-7, I.R.B. 2007-5, 395 is modified.

The IRS has issued guidance and temporary relief for required minimum distribution (RMD) changes in 2020. Distributions that would have been RMDs under old law are treated as eligible rollover distributions. The 60-day rollover period deadline for any 2020 RMDs already taken has been extended to August 31, 2020. Notice 2007-7, I.R.B. 2007-5, 395 is modified.

SECURE and CARES Acts
The new guidance addresses RMD issues arising from recent unexpected changes in the rules. The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act) ( P.L. 116-94), enacted at the end of 2019, changed the required beginning date for RMDs for individuals turning age 70-1/2 in 2020. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act ( P.L. 116-136), enacted in March 2020, waived the RMD requirements for 2020.

Plans, administrators, and individuals were taken by surprise. Some plans and participants treated distributions as RMDs even though they were not under new rules then in effect. The SECURE Act provided no relief. However, the CARES Act allowed plans and participants to treat would-be RMDs as eligible rollover distributions. Still, under the rules, individuals have 60 days to recontribute distributions, and can only do that once in a 12-month period. That left individuals who took early distributions twisting in the wind, not to mention people taking monthly RMD installments.

60-Day Deadline Extended
Under the new relief, any distribution already taken in 2020 that would have been an RMD under the old rules has a 60-day recontribution deadline of no earlier than August 31. For example, if someone took a distribution in January 2020 that would have been an RMD under the old rules (either sets of old rules), they have until August 31 to recontribute it to an eligible plan or IRA.

For an IRA owner or beneficiary who has already received a distribution that would have been an RMD in 2020 but for the 2020 RMD waiver under the CARES Act or the change in the required beginning date under the SECURE Act, the recipient may repay the distribution to the distributing IRA, even if the repayment is made more than 60 days after the distribution, provided the repayment is made no later than August 31, 2020. The repayment will be treated as a rollover, but will be subject to the one rollover per 12-month period limitation or the restriction on nonspousal beneficiary rollovers.

SECURE Act Relief
Distributions that were intended as RMDs but in fact are not due to the SECURE Act change in required beginning date are treated as eligible rollover distributions. RMDs do not have to satisfy rules regarding mandatory withholding, the option of a direct rollover, and notice of that right. Under this relief, individuals and plans can still treat these as eligible rollover distributions.

2020 Waiver Guidance
The IRS has clarified that the CARES Act relief applies for 2020 distributions that would have been RMDs, had it not been for the 2020 RMD waiver. These include distributions to a plan participant paid in 2020 (or paid in 2021 for the 2020 calendar year in the case of an employee who has a required beginning date of April 1, 2021) if the payments equal the amounts that would have been RMDs in (or for) 2020 had it not been for 2020 RMD waiver. They also include distributions that are one or more payments (that include the 2020 RMDs) in a series of substantially equal periodic payments made at least annually and expected to last for the participant’s life or life expectancy, the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of the participant and the participant’s designated beneficiary, or for a period of at least 10 years.

For a plan participant with a required beginning date of April 1, 2021, distributions paid in 2021 that would have been an RMD for 2021 had it not been for the CARES Act are treated as eligible rollover distributions. However, a plan participant with a required beginning date of April 1, 2021, must still receive RMD for the 2021 calendar year by December 31, 2021. If the employee receives a distribution during 2021, that distribution is an RMD for the 2021 calendar year to the extent the total RMD for 2021 has not been satisfied even if the distribution is made on or before April 1, 2021, and accordingly, is not an eligible rollover distribution. However, to the extent the RMD for 2021 has been satisfied, subsequent amounts distributed in 2021 that would otherwise not be eligible rollover distributions may be rolled over.

Extended Deadlines Due to 2020 Waiver
If a plan permits an employee or beneficiary to elect whether the 5-year rule or the life expectancy rule applies in determining RMDs, then the deadline for making that election typically would be the end of calendar year following the calendar year of the employee’s death. For example, if a 50-year-old employee in a plan providing the election died in 2019 with his sister as his designated beneficiary, the plan provision would require the election by the end of 2020. However, that type of plan may be amended to permit the extension of the election deadline to the end of 2021.

The RMD waiver extends the time for making a direct rollover for a nonspouse designated beneficiary if the participant died in 2019. A special rule provides that if the 5-year rule applies to a benefit under a plan, the nonspouse designated beneficiary may determine the amount that is not eligible for rollover because it is an RMD using the life expectancy rule in the case of a distribution made prior to the end of the year following the year of death. This special rule is modified so that if the employee’s death occurred in 2019, the nonspouse designated beneficiary has until the end of 2021 to make the direct rollover and use the life expectancy rule.

Plan Amendments
The guidance provides a sample plan amendment for defined contribution plans that plan sponsors may adopt to implement waiver rules. Any plan amendment must be adopted no later than the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2022 (January 1, 2024, for governmental plans), and must reflect operation of the plan beginning with the effective date of the plan amendment. Timely adoption of the amendment must be shown by a written document signed and dated by the employer (including an adopting employer of a pre-approved plan). IRAs do not need to be amended.

The IRS has clarified and provided relief for mid-year amendments reducing safe harbor contributions. An updated safe harbor notice and an election opportunity must be provided even if the change is only for highly compensated employees. Coronavirus (COVID-19) relief applies if a plan amendment is adopted between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2020. For nonelective contribution plans, the supplemental notice requirement is satisfied if provided no later than August 31, 2020, and the amendment that reduces or suspends contributions is adopted no later than the effective date of the reduction or suspension. Notice 2016-16, I.R.B., 2016-7, 318, is clarified.

The IRS has clarified and provided relief for mid-year amendments reducing safe harbor contributions. An updated safe harbor notice and an election opportunity must be provided even if the change is only for highly compensated employees. Coronavirus (COVID-19) relief applies if a plan amendment is adopted between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2020. For nonelective contribution plans, the supplemental notice requirement is satisfied if provided no later than August 31, 2020, and the amendment that reduces or suspends contributions is adopted no later than the effective date of the reduction or suspension. Notice 2016-16, I.R.B., 2016-7, 318, is clarified.

Mid-Year Amendments
Safe harbor contributions for a plan year may be amended during the plan year to reduce or suspend future matching or nonelective contributions only under certain conditions. Among them are that the employer must either (1) be operating at an economic loss for the plan year, or (2) have included in the plan’s safe harbor notice for the plan year a statement that the plan may be amended during the plan year to reduce or suspend safe harbor contributions, and that the reduction or suspension will not apply earlier than 30 days after all eligible employees are provided notice of the reduction or suspension.

The reduction or suspension of safe harbor contributions may be effective no earlier than the later of the date the amendment is adopted or 30 days after eligible employees are provided in a supplemental notice. Eligible employees must be given a reasonable opportunity (including a reasonable period after receipt of the supplemental notice) prior to the reduction or suspension of safe harbor contributions to change their cash or deferred elections and, if applicable, their employee contribution elections.

Safe Harbor Contributions
Reductions or suspensions of contributions. If a plan amendment that reduces or suspends safe harbor matching or nonelective contributions during a plan year is adopted between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2020, then the plan will not be treated as failing to satisfy the requirement that the employer either (1) is operating at an economic loss; or (2) has included in the plan’s safe harbor notice for the plan year a statement that (a) the plan may be amended during the plan year to reduce or suspend the safe harbor contributions and (b) the reduction or suspension will not apply until at least 30 days after all eligible employees are provided notice of the reduction or suspension.

Supplemental notice requirement. If a plan amendment that reduces or suspends safe harbor nonelective contributions during a plan year is adopted between March 13, 2020, and August 31, 2020, then the plan will not be treated as failing to satisfy the supplemental notice requirements merely because it is not provided to eligible employees at least 30 days before the reduction or suspension of safe harbor nonelective contributions is effective, provided that (1) the supplemental notice is provided to eligible employees no later than August 31, 2020, and (2) the plan amendment that reduces or suspends safe harbor nonelective contributions is adopted no later than the effective date of the reduction or suspension of safe harbor nonelective contributions.

There is no relief with respect to the timing of supplemental notices for a mid-year reduction or suspension of safe harbor matching contributions because matching contribution levels communicated to employees directly affect employee decisions regarding elective contributions (and, if applicable, employee contributions).

HCE Contributions
The new notice clarifies that an updated safe harbor notice and an election opportunity (as required by Notice 2016-16, I.R.B. 2016-7, 318) must be provided to highly compensated employees (HCEs) to whom the mid-year change applies, determined as of the date of issuance of the updated safe harbor notice. This rule applies even if the change only applies to HCEs.

The IRS amended final regulations with guidance on the Code Sec. 199A deduction for suspended losses and shareholders of regulated investment companies (RICs). The amendments address the treatment of suspended losses included in qualified business income (QBI), the deduction allowed to a shareholder in a regulated investment company (RIC), and additional rules related to trusts and estates. The IRS had previously issued final and proposed regulations addressing these issues (NPRM REG-134652-18)

The IRS amended final regulations with guidance on the Code Sec. 199A deduction for suspended losses and shareholders of regulated investment companies (RICs). The amendments address the treatment of suspended losses included in qualified business income (QBI), the deduction allowed to a shareholder in a regulated investment company (RIC), and additional rules related to trusts and estates. The IRS had previously issued final and proposed regulations addressing these issues ( NPRM REG-134652-18)

Background
Code Sec. 199A provides a deduction of up to 20 percent of qualified business income (QBI) from a U.S. trade or business operated as a sole proprietorship, or through a partnership, S corporation, trust, or estate. If the taxpayer’s taxable income exceeds the threshold amount in Code Sec. 199A(e)(2), the deduction may be limited. Statutory limitations are subject to phase-in rules. Code Sec. 199A also provides individuals and some trusts and estates a deduction of up to 20 percent of their combined qualified real estate investment trust (REIT) dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership (PTP) income.

461(l) Losses
Under Reg. §1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv), previously disallowed losses or deductions allowed in the tax year are generally taken into account for computing QBI, except to the extent the losses or deductions were disallowed, suspended, limited, or carried over from tax years ending before January 1, 2018. The final regulations amend Reg. §1.199A-3(b)(1)(iv)(A) to specifically reference excess business losses disallowed by Code Sec. 461(l) and treated as a net operating loss (NOL) carryover for the tax year for purposes of determining any NOL carryover in subsequent tax years. The IRS notes that the list of statutes in the regulation is not exhaustive

Phase-in Rules for SSTB Losses
The amendments also clarify how the phase-in rules apply when a taxpayer has a suspended or disallowed loss or deduction from a specified service trade or business (SSTB). If the individual’s taxable income is at or below the threshold amount in the year the loss or deduction is incurred, the entire disallowed loss or deduction is treated as QBI from a separate trade or business in the later tax year in which the loss is allowed. If the individual’s taxable income is within the phase-in range, only a percentage of the disallowed loss or deduction is taken into account in the later tax year. If the individual’s taxable income exceeds the phase-in range, the loss or deduction is not included in QBI.

Conduit Treatment
The final regulations provide conduit treatment for qualified REIT dividends earned by a RIC. Conduit treatment happens when a RIC treats dividends paid to a shareholder in the same or similar manner as the shareholder would treat the underlying item of income or gain if the shareholder realized it directly. The Treasury Department and IRS continue to consider comments on whether to provide conduit treatment for qualified PTP income, and for RIC income from an activity that would generate QBI if conducted by a partnership or an S corporation.

Separate Share Rule
The separate share applies for a trust or estate described in Code Sec. 663(c) with substantially separate and independent shares for multiple beneficiaries. Under the final regulations, the trust or estate will be treated as a single trust or estate for determining taxable income, net capital gain, net QBI, W-2 wages, unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property, qualified REIT dividends, and qualified PTP income for each trade or business of the trust or estate, and for computing the W-2 wage and UBIA of qualified property limitations.

Applicability
The amended regulations apply to tax years beginning 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. However, taxpayers may choose to apply the amendments before that date. Taxpayers who chose to rely on the proposed regulations issued in February 2019 may continue to do so until the date these amendments are published.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have released drafts of proposed partnership forms for tax year 2021 (the 2022 filing season). The proposed forms are intended to provide greater clarity for partners on how to compute their U.S. income tax liability for relevant international tax items, including claiming deductions and credits. The redesigned forms and instructions will also give useful guidance to partnerships on how to provide international tax information to their partners in a standardized format.

The Treasury Department and the IRS have released drafts of proposed partnership forms for tax year 2021 (the 2022 filing season). The proposed forms are intended to provide greater clarity for partners on how to compute their U.S. income tax liability for relevant international tax items, including claiming deductions and credits. The redesigned forms and instructions will also give useful guidance to partnerships on how to provide international tax information to their partners in a standardized format.

The draft forms are:

• Schedule K-2 (Form 1065), Partners’ Distributive Share Items—International, and Instructions for Schedule K-2.
• Schedule K-3 (Form 1065), Partner’s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc.—International ; and Instructions for Schedule K-3.

These proposed forms would apply to a partnership required to file Form 1065 only if it has "items of international tax relevance" (i.e., generally, foreign activities or foreign partners). The changes would not affect domestic partnerships with no international tax items to report.

Partner Reporting of International Items
Partners must report international tax information on their tax returns on several tax forms and schedules. They generally obtain this information from their partnerships, usually through narrative statements attached to one or more Schedules K-1 (Form 1065), Partner’s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. Since partnerships compile these statements in a variety of formats, partners might have difficulties translating the statements onto their own returns.

To ease this burden, the Treasury and IRS state that the proposed changes would provide a standard format that offers greater clarity to both partnerships and their partners. This standard format is designed to better align the information that partnerships provide on the schedules with the tax forms used by partners, so that partners can more easily prepare their tax returns, and the IRS can more efficiently verify taxpayer compliance. It is intended that all information to be reported on the new schedules is already necessary for the partnership to provide to partners or is available to the partnership.

Draft Schedules K-2 and K-3
Any partnership that is required to file Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, and has items relevant to the determination of the U.S. tax or certain withholding tax or reporting obligations of its partners under the international provisions of the Code, will be required to complete the relevant parts of Schedule K-2 and Schedule K-3.

The proposed parts included in new Schedule K-2 (Form 1065) replace portions of existing Form 1065, Schedule K, lines 16(a) through 16(r). The proposed schedule provides for international tax information to be reported in a standardized manner. The partnership will attach Schedule K-2 to its Form 1065.

The proposed parts included in new Schedule K-3 (Form 1065) replace portions of Schedule K-1 (Form 1065), Part III, Boxes 16 and 20. The proposed schedule provides information to the partner generally in the format of the following forms that the partner might need to complete:

• Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return;
• Form 1040-NR, U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return;
• Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit (Individual, Estate, or Trust;
• Form 1118, Foreign Tax Credit—Corporations;
• Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return;
• Form 1120-F, U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Corporation;
• Form 4797, Sales of Business Property;
• Form 8949, Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets;
• Form 8991, Tax on Base Erosion Payments of Taxpayers With Substantial Gross Receipts;
• Form 8992, U.S. Shareholder Calculation of Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI); and
• Form 8993, Section 250 Deduction for Foreign Derived Intangible Income (FDII) and Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI).

The partnership will provide Schedule K-3 to its partners according to the timeline for providing Schedule K-1.

Comments Requested
The draft schedules and instructions have been released to allow partnerships and other stakeholders time to consider the proposed changes and provide comments that can be taken into account in finalizing the schedules and instructions. The Treasury and IRS will be actively engaged with stakeholders to solicit input on these proposed changes before the forms are finalized later in 2020.

Affected stakeholders can submit comments through September 14, 2020. Written comments should be sent to the following email address: lbi.passthrough.international.form.changes@irs.gov with the subject line: "International Form Changes."

For additional information and updates, see https://www.irs.gov/businesses/1065-form-changes.

Other Revisions
The Treasury and IRS plan similar revisions, as applicable, to Form 1120-S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, and Form 8865, Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships. They welcome comments on similar changes to be made to these forms for the 2021 tax year.

The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations covering the Code Sec. 250 deduction for foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) and global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). Proposed regulations were issued on March 6, 2019 (NPRM REG-104464-18). The final regulations maintain the basic approach and structure of the proposed regulations and provide guidance on computation of the deduction and the determination of FDII, including in the consolidated return context. Additionally, rules requiring the filing of Form 8993, Section 250 Deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income and Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, are finalized.

The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations covering the Code Sec. 250 deduction for foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) and global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). Proposed regulations were issued on March 6, 2019 (NPRM REG-104464-18). The final regulations maintain the basic approach and structure of the proposed regulations and provide guidance on computation of the deduction and the determination of FDII, including in the consolidated return context. Additionally, rules requiring the filing of Form 8993, Section 250 Deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income and Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, are finalized.

Section 250 Deduction
The Code Sec. 250 deduction is available to domestic corporations for:

• a portion of profits attributable U.S. activities that serve foreign markets, and
• a portion of profits of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs).

The deduction is available with respect to a domestic corporation’s "excess return" or return in excess of fixed return on tangible assets, derived from serving foreign markets. FDII is the portion of the excess return derived from serving foreign markets directly from the United States. GILTI is the portion of the excess return derived through foreign affiliates. The deduction results in a lower effective U.S. tax rate on a U.S. corporation’s FDII and GILTI.

Documentation Requirements
The proposed regulations defined terms and provide specific documents that were required to establish that income was derived from serving foreign markets. Commentators found that the proposed regulations could present compliance burdens. Accordingly, the final regulations provide a more flexible approach than the specific documentation requirements.

For many types of sales and services, eligibility for the Code Sec. 250 deduction is subject to the general requirement under the Code that deductions must be supported by sufficient substantiation, including the use of available business records.

More specific substantiation requirements are required for:

• intangible property;
• sales of general property to resellers and manufacturers; and
• the provision of general services to recipients.

The requirements include either:

• a specific document;
• information from the recipient obtained or created in the ordinary course of a trade or business; or
• a taxpayer statement with corroborating evidence.

Taxpayers may choose a method of substantiation among the methods. The specific substantiation requirements do not apply to businesses with less than $25 million in gross receipts. The final regulations also eliminate references to the use of market research to establish foreign use.

The final regulations clarify how to establish foreign use for sales of digital content and how to establish a recipient’s location outside of the United States with respect to electronically supplied services and advertising services. The final regulations:

• evaluate the sale of a copyrighted article under the general property rules, rather than under the rules for foreign use of intangible property;
• provide new rules for establishing whether a sale of digital content is for foreign use;
• define "digital content" as a computer program or any other content in digital format; and
• provide that a sale of general property that primarily includes digital content is a foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI) sale if the end user downloads or accesses the content on a device located outside of the United States.

The final regulations add two subcategories of general services:

• a subcategory of general services for electronically supplied services; and
• a subcategory for advertising services.

In these cases, the location of the recipient is where the content is accessed or viewed.

Foreign Military Sales and Services
The proposed regulations provided special rules to cover U.S. Defense Contractors’ military sales of equipment and provision of services to the U.S. government that are subsequently sold or provided to a foreign government.

The final regulations adopt the proposed regulations, which treat sales and services provided to the U.S. government under the Arms Export Control Act as a sale or provision of services to the foreign government that is eligible for the deduction. The final regulations relax the substantiation requirements, so that the general substantiation requirements apply.

Ratio of FDDEI to DEI
A corporation’s FDII is defined as its deemed intangible income (DII) multiplied by the corporation’s foreign-derived ratio. This is the ratio of the corporation’s foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI) to its deduction eligible income (DEI).

The final regulations retain the rule that the domestic corporation must allocate expenses to its gross FDDEI to determine the numerator of the foreign-derived ratio.

Deduction for Individuals
The final regulations extend the Code Sec. 250 deduction with respect to GILTI, to individuals—including individual partners and individual S corporation shareholders—making the Code Sec. 962 election to be treated as a domestic corporation.

Additional Changes
Additional changes in the final regulations generally expand situations in which a transaction will be an FDDEI transaction, including:

• a property service may be a FDDEI service if it is provided with respect to property temporarily located in the United States;
• the definition of transportation services is revised to include freight forwarding services;
• the sale of a manufacturing method or process intangible to a foreign unrelated party is for foreign use based on the location of the manufacture rather that the end user;
• elimination of the rule that allowed the deduction for sales of international property only if certain time and use thresholds were met and the replacement of foreign use based on place of registration;
• clarification that general property includes physical commodities sold pursuant to derivative contracts, and that hedging sales impact a taxpayer’s income; and
• removal of the rule that the sale of an interest in a foreign branch is treated as giving rise to foreign branch income preventing the deduction.

Taxpayers can also use any reasonable method to determine the ordering of rules that limit deductions based on taxable income until additional rules are issued.

The IRS is calling on any taxpayers involved in syndicated conservation easement transactions who receives a settlement offer from the agency to accept it soon. The Service made this request in the wake of the Tax Court’s recent strike down of four additional abusive syndicated conservation easement transactions.

Settlement Offers
Time-limited settlement offers, which the IRS announced on June 25 ( IR-2020-130), are only being made to certain taxpayers with pending docketed Tax Court cases involving this type of abusive transaction. The IRS declared that these and other recent Tax Court decisions support the abusive nature of the underlying syndicated conservation easement deduction.

The four recent Tax Court decisions in question disallowed conservation easement deductions totaling nearly $21 million ( Village at Effingham, LLC, TC Memo. 2020-102, Dec. 61,715(M); Riverside Place, LLC, TC Memo. 2020-103, Dec. 61,716(M); Maple Landing, LLC, TC Memo. 2020-104, Dec. 61,717(M); Englewood Place, LLC, TC Memo. 2020-105, Dec. 61,718(M)).

Abusive Transactions
While recognizing the important role of legitimate conservation easement deductions in incentivizing land preservation for future generations, the IRS pointed out that abusive syndicated conservation easement transactions have been of concern for several years.

In listed syndicated conservation easement structures, promoters syndicate ownership interests in real property through partnerships, using promotional materials to suggest that prospective investors may be entitled to a share of a conservation easement contribution deduction that equals or exceeds two and one-half times the investment amount. The promoters obtain an appraisal that greatly inflates the value of the conservation easement, based on a fictional and unrealistic highest and best use of the property before it was encumbered with the easement. After the investors invest in the partnership, the partnership donates a conservation easement to a land trust. Investors in the partnership then claim a deduction based on an inflated value. According to the IRS, the investors typically claim charitable contribution deductions that grossly multiply their actual investment in the transaction and defy common sense.

The IRS is aware that some promoters of these abusive transactions have downplayed the significance of the string of recent court decisions holding in the government’s favor, arguing that their cases are somehow different or that those decisions might be reversed on appeal. These promoters ignore common sense and argue that the real dispute is about value, neglecting to explain how the reporting of short-term appreciation, often exceeding many multiples of reality, could possibly withstand judicial scrutiny. "Taxpayers should ignore this nonsense, take an objective look at their cases, and cut their losses," said IRS Chief Counsel Mike Desmond; "abusive transactions, like settlement offers, do not get better with time, and this is a good opportunity to get out," he added.